ACCC: Qantas Sold Tickets on Already-Cancelled Flights

Qantas planes at Brisbane Airport under stormy clouds
The ACCC alleges Qantas continued to sell tickets on flights it had already cancelled. Photo: Matt Graham.

The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) is taking Qantas to court, alleging the airline continued to sell tickets on more than 8,000 flights it had already cancelled.

The ACCC also claims Qantas failed to notify customers with existing tickets that it had cancelled their flights for up to 47 days. It says that Qantas did not inform customers of the cancellations or update its “Manage Booking” page to reflect the cancellation for two days or more. On average, the ACCC says the delay was approximately 18 days and that this affected around 70% of cancelled flights between May and July 2022.

The ACCC regards this false, misleading or deceptive conduct in breach of Australian Consumer Law.

“We allege that Qantas’ conduct in continuing to sell tickets to cancelled flights, and not updating ticketholders about cancelled flights, left customers with less time to make alternative arrangements and may have led to them paying higher prices to fly at a particular time not knowing that flight had already been cancelled,” ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

In one example, according to the ACCC, Qantas sold 21 tickets on QF73 from Sydney to San Francisco, originally scheduled to depart on 28 July 2023, up to 40 days after it had already cancelled the flight.

“We allege that Qantas made many of these cancellations for reasons that were within its control, such as network optimisation including in response to shifts in consumer demand, route withdrawals or retention of take-off and landing slots at certain airports,” Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.

“However, this case does not involve any alleged breach in relation to the actual cancellation of flights, but rather relates to Qantas’ conduct after it had cancelled the flights.”

Many AFF members were affected

During 2022, many Australian Frequent Flyer members reported being affected by this practice. They wrote on the AFF forum that Qantas had “zeroed out” inventory on flights for which they had bookings, which were ultimately cancelled at a later date. But Qantas did not notify them of the cancellation – nor offer alternative travel arrangements – for weeks after the airline ceased selling new tickets.

Cancelled flights
Qantas did not notify some customers that their flights would be cancelled for weeks after the flights were removed from sale. Photo: Adobe Stock.

Some passengers even proactively contacted Qantas to request rebooking onto new flights after Qantas removed their flights from sale, pending a cancellation. But the Qantas contact centre was not able to offer alternative arrangements because their system showed the flights as still operating. In fact, many contact centre agents informed customers that their “zeroed-out” flights were still operating as scheduled.

Moving international flight schedules

In October 2021, Qantas released its initial international schedule for sale after the announcement that Australia’s borders would re-open. At the time, Australian Frequent Flyer did an analysis of these schedules and came to the conclusion that Qantas did not have enough aircraft available to reliably operate the full international schedule it was selling. Indeed, Qantas did cancel some flights closer to the departure date as the airline rationalised its schedule.

It would be fair to say that forecasting demand for international flights in October 2021 would have been extremely difficult. International borders had been shut for well over a year and many markets still had entry restrictions. So Qantas may not yet have known which flights would sell.

But after making the decision to cancel flights or delay the resumption of certain routes, such as Sydney-San Francisco, there was often a lag between the time flights were removed from sale and the time when customers were informed their flights had been cancelled.

What does Qantas have to say?

Qantas has issued the following statement about the ACCC action:

Qantas takes these allegations by the ACCC seriously.

We have a longstanding approach to managing cancellations for flights, with a focus on providing customers with rebooking options or refunds. It’s a process that is consistent with common practice at many other airlines.

It’s important to note that the period examined by the ACCC between May and July 2022 was a time of unprecedented upheaval for the entire airline industry. All airlines were experiencing well-publicised issues from a very challenging restart, with ongoing border uncertainty, industry wide staff shortages and fleet availability causing a lot of disruption.

We will examine the details of the ACCC’s allegations and respond to them in full in court.

The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 90 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil & Kazakhstan. His interests include aviation, economics & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can connect with Matt by posting on the Australian Frequent Flyer community forum and tagging @AFF Editor.
________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

ABC reports

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has launched legal action against Qantas for allegedly advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights it had already cancelled but not removed from sale.

The ACCC claims that Qantas kept selling tickets for the flights that were scheduled to depart between May and July 2022 for an average of more than two weeks after the cancellation of the flights — and in some cases, up to 47 days.

The competition watchdog also alleges Qantas failed to notify existing ticketholders their flights had been cancelled for an average of 18 days, and up to 48 days, for more than 10,000 flights set to take off between May and July 2022.

Reply Like

click to expand...

This one could be interesting. Lots of noise about Qantas at the moment, some of it justified, some not so much, but this issue warrants genuine scrutiny. What-aboutism and other apologetics won't carry any weight beyond forums like these.

I vividly recall multiple situations during Covid where Qantas had removed flights from public sale but not officially cancelled them. It was hard to cast it as anything other than a deliberate strategy not just to hold onto passengers' money longer, but also to get those passengers to "voluntarily" cancel flights and preclude the possibility of a refund even though Qantas had quietly cancelled them already.

For all my flight woes during Covid --- some with Qantas, plenty not including several that were far worse than dealing with Qantas --- this weird behaviour from Qantas stuck out to me as truly dodgy and not just a retrospective "gotcha." I'm glad it's warranted review.

Reply 9 Likes

click to expand...

A classic example of this would have been the continued push back of QF73/74 to SFO. I recall many members here mentioning how flights had been zeroed out in ExpertFlyer, but still being advertised for sale on the Qantas website.

Reply 6 Likes

New on the ABC this morning

ACCC takes Qantas to court for allegedly selling tickets for cancelled flights

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has launched legal action against Qantas for allegedly advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights it had already cancelled but not removed from sale.

The ACCC claims that Qantas kept selling tickets for the flights that were scheduled to depart between May and July 2022 for an average of more than two weeks after the cancellation of the flights — and in some cases, up to 47 days.

Original bolding .

Reply Like

click to expand...

This sums it up really: "We allege that Qantas' conduct in continuing to sell tickets to cancelled flights, and not updating ticketholders about cancelled flights, left customers with less time to make alternative arrangements and may have led to them paying higher prices to fly at a particular time not knowing that flight had already been cancelled,"

Reply 4 Likes

AFF called this out last year - before the period when the ACCC alleges this to have happened.

Reply 10 Likes

click to expand...

Still going on and rife.

A FB group that I lurk in has a post this morning about cancelled JQ flights in November. Comments littered with similar stories from stressed pax being put over a barrel.

Reply 1 Like

Still going on and rife.

A FB group that I lurk in has a post this morning about cancelled JQ flights in November. Comments littered with similar stories from stressed pax being put over a barrel.

I don't think this is related at all.
The article is alleging that QF was cancelling flights and NOT advising its passengers and still selling tickets.

You're just saying customers are annoyed because of schedule changes, which is standard in the airline industry. Not justifying it, but two separate things at play here.

Reply 4 Likes