What Are Air Services Agreements?

Qatar Airways Boeing 777 flies over Sydney
A Qatar Airways Boeing 777. Photo: Qatar Airways.

The Australian government’s refusal to grant Qatar Airways additional flights into Australia’s major cities has been a hot topic in the news lately.

There has been plenty of debate about whether this was a good decision. That’s not what this article is about. Instead, I thought it might be timely to explain how air services agreements work. This is the mechanism that the federal government is using to deny Qatar Airways more access to the Australian market.

What are air services agreements?

For an Australian airline to fly to another country, the governments of both Australia and the destination country must have a treaty in place allowing them to do so. Most countries have bilateral aviation treaties with a range of other countries that specify the rights of airlines from both countries to access the other market.

These treaties are typically air services agreements that specify things like the routes airlines may fly, or the number of flights or passengers that can be carried. The agreements may also have clauses around ownership criteria that airlines need to meet to fly to the other country, as well as safety requirements.

This bilateral system dates back to the Chicago Convention in 1944, which also saw the creation of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). Their original intention was to allow countries to protect their local aviation markets, as well as ensuring they maintain sovereignty over their airspace. This is also why airlines can’t fly over other countries without that country’s express permission.

Today, there are over 3,000 bilateral air services agreements between different countries. Australia is a party to over 100 of these. There are also various plurilateral agreements covering groups of countries (such as the European Union).

Crucially, these agreements are between governments and not individual airlines. So, it’s not technically correct to say that the Australian government is blocking Qatar Airways (the airline). But in practice, the only Qatari airline that would use the available capacity under the Australia-Qatar bilateral treaty would be Qatar Airways.

These agreements are also reciprocal. This means that Australian airlines wanting to fly to Qatar would be subject to the same capacity restrictions that Qatari airlines are when flying to Australia. However, given the current state of Qantas and Qatar Airways’ relationship, and Virgin Australia’s lack of long-haul aircraft, it’s very unlikely any Australian airline would launch flights to Doha any time soon.

Open skies agreements

Open skies agreements are the most liberal type of air service treaty that countries can have with each other. These allow airlines from both countries to operate an unlimited number of flights between the two countries. One of the world’s largest open skies agreements, signed in 2007, is between the United States and European Union.

Australia currently has open skies agreements with a handful of countries, including:

  • China
  • India
  • Japan (maximum 21 weekly flights to/from Haneda Airport)
  • New Zealand
  • Singapore
  • Switzerland
  • Taiwan
  • UK
  • USA

More than half of international passengers flying from Australia travel to one of these countries.

What are the terms of the air services agreement between Australia and Qatar?

The terms of the current bilateral aviation treaty between Australia and Qatar are published by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications in the Register of Available Capacity.

This is the exact wording relating to the passenger capacity agreement between Australia and Qatar:

To/from Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane or Perth:
28 frequencies in each direction per week with any aircraft type
In addition , a total of seven (7) frequencies per week with any aircraft type between Qatar and Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth provided such services operate via or beyond to a point in Australia other than Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.

To/from any point in Australia other than Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth:
Unrestricted frequencies with any aircraft type.

Qatar Airways’ current routes to Australia

Qatar Airways already flies daily to Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth, using its entire allocation. Sydney and Perth are served by Airbus A380s – the world’s largest passenger aircraft. Melbourne and Brisbane receive Boeing 777-300ERs, the second-largest aircraft in Qatar Airways’ fleet.

Qatari airlines have unrestricted access to other Australian cities, and Qatar Airways currently has a daily non-stop flight from Doha to Adelaide.

Qatar Airways also operates a second daily flight from Doha to Adelaide via Melbourne, taking advantage of the seven extra weekly frequencies allowed to another point in Australia via a major city. That’s why Qatar Airways runs a “ghost flight” between Melbourne and Adelaide every day, as we’ve covered previously. The Melbourne-Adelaide leg typically has around 10-20 passengers on board.

Qatar Airways Boeing 777 in Adelaide
Qatar Airways is flying a near-empty Boeing 777-300ER from Melbourne to Adelaide and back every day. Photo: Matt Graham.

How Qatar Airways could add capacity to Australia

If Qatar Airways wanted to add more capacity to Australia under the current treaty, it could fly to secondary cities such as Gold Coast, Cairns, Darwin or Canberra. But these are not as commercially attractive and offer less connectivity.

The airline could also send Airbus A380s to Melbourne and Brisbane. But Qatar Airways only has eight Airbus A380s in its fleet, and these are already fully utilised serving the routes between Doha and Sydney, Perth, London, Paris and Bangkok.

Qatar Airways Airbus A380 at Sydney Airport
Qatar Airways only has eight A380s in its fleet. Photo: Qatar Airways.

Agreements with other countries

By comparison, Australia allows airlines from the United Arab Emirates (i.e. Emirates and Etihad) to operate up to 154 weekly services to Australia.

That’s more than ample capacity for the routes between Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Australia. But there are other countries that Australian airlines would like more access to – and are currently unable to get.

For example, Australian airlines are fully utilising their available capacity of 25,000 weekly seats between the major Australian airports and Indonesia. There’s also no room to grow in Fiji.

Denpasar, Bali
Australian airlines can’t add more flights from the major cities to Bali without giving up capacity elsewhere. Photo: Guillaume Marques on Unsplash.

The International Air Services Commission (IASC)

When Australian airlines want to add flights to countries with limited capacity allocations for Australian operators, they must apply for a capacity allocation from the International Air Services Commission (IASC). This is an independent government authority that was set up in 1992.

The IASC considers the available capacity and the likely effect on competition when allocating capacity entitlements to Australian airlines. The IASC also invites third parties to make submissions regarding applications from airlines.

Although many of these capacity allocations are uncontroversial, Qantas and Virgin Australia both fought bitterly for a limited allocation of extra slots at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport in 2019. The IASC ultimately ended up awarding both Qantas and Virgin the right to seven weekly flights (on top of Qantas’ existing allocation of seven weekly flights).

Virgin Australia originally planned to operate a Brisbane-Tokyo flight using an Airbus A330 using this allocation. But it now operates a Cairns-Tokyo flight with a Boeing 737 so that it doesn’t lose those valuable slots at Haneda Airport.

The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 90 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil & Kazakhstan. His interests include economics, aviation & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can connect with Matt by posting on the Australian Frequent Flyer community forum and tagging @AFF Editor.
________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

and the agreement between Australia and France only allows for three flights per week. This is one reason that has been cited for Qantas deciding not to fly to Paris.

That's not quite right.
The agreement with France has 3 different "routes", such that New Caledonia has a different limit to mainland France.

The cap to mainland France is 3.0 "units", not flights. A "unit" is based on the number of seats on the aircraft used. An aircraft with over 400 seats is 1 "unit".
The Qantas config of 236 seats on a 787 would fall into the 0.5 unit range, which would allow for 6 flights/week.

Reply 2 Likes

That's not quite right.
The agreement with France has 3 different "routes", such that New Caledonia has a different limit to mainland France.

The cap to mainland France is 3.0 "units", not flights. A "unit" is based on the number of seats on the aircraft used. An aircraft with over 400 seats is 1 "unit".
The Qantas config of 236 seats on a 787 would fall into the 0.5 unit range, which would allow for 6 flights/week.

Good pick up. I've removed that from the article.

Interestingly, the register of available capacity says that "currently there is no capacity available" on Route 1.

Route 1
3.0 units of capacity per week in each direction.

The designated airlines of Australia may enter into arrangements with other airlines, including airlines of third countries, to undertake services through code share, blocked space or other joint venture arrangements - currently there is no capacity available..

Reply 2 Likes

click to expand...

In addition Australia- New Zealand is a single aviation market (SAM)

Memorandum of Understanding 1992
In 1996, Australia and New Zealand agreed to create a single market for air transport that was distinct from the previous agreements which were more restrictive. Some notable changes that affect Trans-Tasman travel include allowing Australia and New Zealand to operate in each other's domestic markets.[19]

This was followed by an endorsement of the open skies agreement under the International Civil Aviation Organization in 2007 which further allowed Australia and New Zealand's international flights to operate in each other's domains beyond to third countries without restriction.[19]

Hence

  • QF flying AKL to USA
  • Air NZ owning and operating a domestic airline in Australia - Ansett (RIP),
  • Qantas group operating domestic airlines in NZ. Initially QF and then JQ
  • Virgin Au operating NZ domestic flights 2007-2010 Virgin Australia Airlines (NZ) - Wikipedia

In addition allows non AU NZ airlines to operate trans Tasman. Without restriction?? Currently LATAM, EK, CI, Air Asia, Batik Air PER-AKL (needs a check- changes from time to time). QR Qatar was flying AKL-ADL and SIN was flying WLG-CBR.

Other links

Reply 2 Likes

click to expand...

D7 Air Asia X is still a good one, even though LCC, but their J cabin is quite cheap AKL - SYD.
Dep is quite late in the day, so gives enough time to finish what you have to do in AKL and then get to airport 16.30 to get the 18.xx flight AKL - SYD.

Reply 1 Like

Good pick up. I've removed that from the article.

Interestingly, the register of available capacity says that "currently there is no capacity available" on Route 1.

That's no capacity for more codeshares.

Reply 1 Like

That's no capacity for more codeshares.

The capacity.is allocated to Qantas to codeshare on Air France services, and Virgin to codeshare on Qatar services.

Reply Like

The agreement allows for 400 seats per day for codeshare services to mainland France. Qantas has 250 seats for codeshares on Air France, British Airways and Emirates.
Virgin has the remaining 150 seats for codeshares on Qatar Airways and Singapore Airways.

Reply 1 Like

Part of competition is MORE than just ticket price. Terms and fees for changes are super important, and there is a cartel operating to keep these high. I fly a USA based airline, and most only charge the difference or nothing. I will never fly QF having been burnt badly . Next remember the ACCC fining airlines including our own for airfreight price collusion. Not sure if there were other past occurrence's or quiet 'deals'. Thirdly Qatar has a very large food relief program aimed at getting grain to African countries - otherwise they would get about nothing. This is a big deal where black lives do matter. As for the QF buyback - with share futures and options etc, I say they should be on their own now - no crutches needed. Finally, all the hoo-haa HAS caused economic damage - and their is no straight explanation. Ministers have advisors, and I wait to read what that advise was - before it was sent back for editing. I notice SA ad Rio flights are heavily 'protected' as if we are in a 1980 timewarp.

I think Qatar is bonkers for addiing new capacity - but the real question is why as Sing and AirNZ not piled in. An outside observer must suspect collusion of sorts.

Reply Like

click to expand...

I think Qatar is bonkers for addiing new capacity - but the real question is why as Sing and AirNZ not piled in. An outside observer must suspect collusion of sorts.

Singapore and New Zealand have open skies treaties with Australia, allowing their international airlines to fly to any location in Australia as much or as little as they want.
I wonder why they don't care about some other nation not getting more capacity under a bilateral treaty they are not party to.

Reply 2 Likes

Several possible reasons. They assume the minister of the day will be promoting tourism and jobs, first, above everything else - unless there are major trade deals afoot. Qatar may be choked and unblocked if they buy more wheat and wine for instance. It may be if refused, QF will have a stronger hand at leasing planes and the swap rate, then say yes to Q after a deal struck. Or it may be an election coming up - and donations may vary .... If I was Qatar, I would be building an LPG import hub in Victoria to cover the East coast gas price ripoff and looming shortage. What does not wash is QF saying they are a good employer - The High Court has spoken. Not sure how illegally sacked people can be compensated 2 years of super at QF super earning rates, compounded, including buyback rights, and tax free status. Lets hope restitution is full, including the fact not paying super is now very much illegal. Lets also hopes QF sues its legal advisor for that move, silly.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...