Search results

Happened to me a few times in SFO. WP QF J. No access to CX Marco Polo - "capacity restrictions". Sent to the AF lounge canteen.

Ok thanks. However we are yet to address those who have no other passive income other than their super/OaG - again once retired they don't have any other funds they can contribute to super after retirement. And again I say for those in this situation preservation of capital is important

When did that become a "tradition' for you? Im thinking about my post retirement routine and wonder if we should also make this a "thing" How do you gauge cabbie honesty in Thailand? (yes I realise your TR is not yet in Thailand) There is going to be an explosion of such services (maybe...

There are other factors other than the ATO which decide when people stop working. But my point remains once fully retired there is no SG, salary sacrifice employee additional tax deductible contributions to top up a super fund. (Sure, if there a lotto win.... For most people where preservation...

It is moot unless earning a taxable income whether through personal effort or through passive income. If passive income is through fully franked dividends there is no taxable income If no personal effort income there is no taxable income If no taxable income, it is very silly to make a tax...

Sure, but once no longer working there is no SG, salary sacrifice.

No longer working for $$$🤷🏼

Which have existed in Japan for hundreds of years. Genetically though 800 years is less than a blink on the evolutionary scale👍

Sure but then you are not fully retired 1734135013 Yes they are not necessarily financial.👍

Interesting the airports it stopped at were mostly secondary smaller airports.

Well thats what the Japanese say - their diet has traditionally included whale.... 🤔

Risk profiles vary wildly between account holders and yours is very individual and for most people will change depending on their ae. My point is only that there should be a starting point of capital preservation at retirement. How the superfund account holder adjusts that is then up to them

Does not sound right What is your height and age - can DM if you like. I'll calculate for you But using generic numbers: 140kg 1.75m 60years Male Using the Harris Benedict formula for basal metabolic rate (of which there are several variations) For males...

Except that once fully retired , there are no further inputs into super That the superfunds make investment options less aggressive at retirement actually recognises the fact that preservation of capital is an important consideration for those in retirement. It is actually better to do that...

Picking the 55yr age is disingenuous. The better number is preservation age. 55-67 is the age when most people can max their super contributions - mortgage free, no school fees etc etc. The difference is the retired (ie the ones who have reached preservation age) cannot add/rebuild their super...

Possibly a convenience thing, if the problem is not sorted with the first course? 1734058929 It's very hard. Sometimes discussions in family environment can be too confronting. Maybe his GP?

So long as the Guvment does not fiddle with it, especially telling fund managers where they can or cannot invest

What would also be interesting would be the Full age pension equivalents vs recipients as many would be part pension

Too small to cause issues - apparently...

I used to buy 5 tickets at a time and get no status whereas another buys 5 tickets and gets status even though the spend is the same. Why?. Because the 5 tickets are for the family including myself