Search results

You need to look at the long term relationship between CX and QF which has been fragile to say the least: CX were very proactive in stopping the setup of Jetstar Hong Kong CX used to be a partner in the Ansett FFP prior to their demise

You should get access.

Most of them have seats that are no longer certified, following the scandalous falsifications Japanese company Koito Industries made for their product.

“What is this, hotel California?” https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19UgveYCG2/

MROs simply don’t have the room, QF, and LH have yet to get all their A380s back in the air after COVID for that reason and EY got their last A380 back last week. Both EY and LH have their own A380 maintenance facilities.

Or go to your local ta

Could have been sold to someone who had too many bintangs on the day and fell asleep

Most of the economy fare are non earning on QF, what they are called is irrelevant, it’s the class that matters, depending on destination economy light can be in L for instance

Look forward to the news.com story about the Lara residents complaining about being woken up

Ring Qantas and speak to a human, you might get lucky

The older I get the more I understand the need to not sweat the small things. Goes to make popcorn…..

Don’t need to watch a video to realise that given the airport within hours of the crash said the car was at a designated surveillance point clear of the runway zone, with the plane hitting the fence and pushing the car into the water.

Have you tried the qantas booking ref?

I think I know about runways, point is there was fence stopping security cars from accessing the controlled area of the airport. The plane left skid marks at the crash gate in my photo. The outside road is more of a goat track, but it’s there

Taken from the access road at the threshold. Your confusing the internal road with the perimeter road which is below the runway elevation a fair bit It does not have line markings

Dry lease starts Saturday IIRC

AIrT raised $100M earlier this year through a subsidiary, AAM 24-1, LLC. This non-recourse agreement, renegotiated with existing institutional investors took it from $30M previously. It won’t yet show on the books as it’s a progressive drawdown until 2027.

And how’s that working out across the ditch? https://www.thepost.co.nz/business/360834809/air-nz-whim-rolls-royce-over-engine-issues-outgoing-boss-says

It’s not airside, there is a fence in the way and traffic on the road would not have the ability to go airside or the ability comms wise There may have been a ARFF crash gate nearby the security checkpoint that would allow access in the event of an emergency, ie

There is a fence kind of getting in the way as they were not airside, not to mention the second hull loss and third accident for this operator who has a very small fleet.