You need to use a link that triggers the QFF point ie https://www.qantas.com/au/en/frequent-flyer/partners/binge.html
Mine triggered earlier in the week
Cabin crew stay with the entity employing them, QF mainline crew often are no longer aircraft rated like they were pre COVID, depending on their EBA they could do A330/737 on the same day, however if an A220 is used, that means NJS crew.
ZCZC
Lots of inaccuracies in your post, for a start Notams may have been around in various forms since early last century but the structure and format was only set with the creation of ICAO in 1947 when the acronym became common usage.
The structure of Notams is set by ICAO annexe 15, if there...
Jumbo is always an option if your into seafood
https://www.jumboseafood.com.sg/en/east-coast-seafood-centre
I would avoid western food and get into local stuff, nothing wrong with a good feed of chicken rice, a deceptively simple dish that is not so simple but oh so tasty.
Most hawker centres...
That’s just echoing what the website does when booking with the same upsell. Given the free breakfast is an APAC thing, word hasn’t got back to HQ yet to fix their systems
Been a while since Boeing have used the d check terminology. It’s now called P48 and I don’t believe any of the QF birds have hit the requirement for their third P 48 let alone their fourth.
Flights with partners can take a week to credit as their systems are not live with QFF, they do a connect and data exchange usually on a weekly basis at set times.
I am waiting to see the outrage expressed via a letter to the editor in the SMH in coming weeks, it’s a scandal compared to the issues you normally read about ;)
I might be slightly biased since I used to write Notams but I don’t think they are a problem from an old ATC perspective and a pilot. They use standardised language and whilst not perfect, generally do a good job. Similar complaints have been leveled at the seafarers equivalent. I spent a bit of...
The wing box is intact on the video as it falls near the coughpit section, and I did read some speculation the No 3 engine prop was missing. Unlike the USMC incident however the tail section is not attached, so possibly it went first?