Search results

  1. Quickstatus

    Middle East Airspace Diversions/Cancellations

    Apparently the Iranians are now denying ever having any contact.🤦
  2. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    No. The airport map in post #6 upthread suggests the location you indicated is E/F
  3. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Correct It was just to show that the phrase "I messed up "was said. I thought you mentioned thread that you were not certain of that?
  4. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    No, the link was to show the ATC said "I messed up" towards the end of the audio - when talking with Frontier To be clear I don't think anyone ahould attribute fault on the basis someone said "I messed up"
  5. Quickstatus

    SQ Adds A380 to Singapore - Melbourne Route

    Why? No one has said that 83/84 will be axed.
  6. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Front and aft I do read elsewhere the CRJ tend to be tail heavy due to rear engines.
  7. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    It was on the AtC audio - towards the end in this Link More than one apparently were trying to cross
  8. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Yes but if that's the cause of the aircraft tilting back. once the pax all evacuated the aircraft should settle back into the normal position?
  9. Quickstatus

    Middle East Airspace Diversions/Cancellations

    Apparently they are talking to one another
  10. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Must be the loss of the nose action shifting the CoG to rear enough for it to be tilted like that. Still it's surprising it does not take much for it to tilt like that.
  11. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Possibly but it's tilted despite the passengers having been evacuated Maybe the wreckage at the front is holding up the front of the aircraft or the missing nose and front undercarriage moving the CoG rearward.
  12. Quickstatus

    Middle East Airspace Diversions/Cancellations

    Including the accounting of reserves/holdings includes tankers in transit rather than just landed fuel which seems on one level at least to be a bit disingenuous.
  13. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    To me, "messed up" does not necessarily equate to 100% fault even if the controller felt that way. ... Other outlets suggest the single front Cabin crew was ejected through the front ... Is CRJ900 centre of gravity to the rear?
  14. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    There would be a cabin crew at the front - lucky even with injuries
  15. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Sounds like the truck though it was at D. Did ATC previously tell the truck to hold short of RWY4 at D? It appears there were more than one truck - "truck and company" and ATC approved RWY crossing in front of the Jazz express (accident aircraft) ..... Possibly the aircraft JZA646 had just...
  16. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    It may have... will need to listen to the ATC - was the clearance given after the aircraft crossed D?
  17. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    The cabin crew at the front is very lucky
  18. Quickstatus

    General Medical issues thread

    We get the red ones where i work in Syd At least you can medicate with the special gin
  19. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Initial info suggests the truck was cleared to cross at D but the accident happened at E/F
  20. Quickstatus

    Air Canada RJ impact with ground vehicle, at least 2 fatalities

    Maybe the accident occurred as they were coming off at a Rapid exit taxiway, and/or the accident cause the aircraft to swing around. The RET possibly is F and the accident with the truck occurred on the runway at the junction of the runway at E/F or just as the aircraft tried to turn off the...
Back
Top