Article: Why Single-Aisle Jets Will Never Have 7-Abreast Seating

I just wish we could have Virgin with some wide bodied planes for Perth to Brisbane,Sydney and Melbourne instead of the 737.
 
I am sorry to tell you that there was a single aisle jet with 7-abreast seating. Channel Airways had a couple of BAC Trident's equipped with a 3 x 4 configuration in the forward cabin. Perhaps the exception that proves the rule but who knows what Ryanair et al might do one day.


trident.jpg
 
I never understood why the 90 second evacuation rule does not also adopt typical passenger demographic to include possibly older mobility impaired.

If it did, there would be a lot more space and legroom for all.
 
I am sorry to tell you that there was a single aisle jet with 7-abreast seating. Channel Airways had a couple of BAC Trident's equipped with a 3 x 4 configuration in the forward cabin. Perhaps the exception that proves the rule but who knows what Ryanair et al might do one day.


View attachment 315051

Good pick-up. I guess the article should say "Why Single-Aisle Jets Will Never Again Have 7-Abreast Seating" - this configuration must have existed before the modern-day safety/certification standards came into effect. It wouldn't be allowed today (thank goodness).
 
Couple of observations on the article…

There were some carriers who configured their 767s with 2-4-2 for at least part of their cabin. A tight squeeze!

The DC-10 and later MD-11 had a couple options for main cabin seating… 2-5-2 was popular because you had to reach a pretty high load factor for the middle seat to be occupied. Today we assume all flights are going to be full, but that wasn’t the case back in the days of the -10s and -11s.

Other option for the -11 were a 2-4-3 configuration… I can’t see any advantage in that!
 
Couple of observations on the article…

There were some carriers who configured their 767s with 2-4-2 for at least part of their cabin. A tight squeeze!

Ah, yes. Ukraine International Airlines and Sunday Airlines (a subsidiary of SCAT in Kazkakhstan) if I recall correctly. Did not look like a fun experience!
The DC-10 and later MD-11 had a couple options for main cabin seating… 2-5-2 was popular because you had to reach a pretty high load factor for the middle seat to be occupied. Today we assume all flights are going to be full, but that wasn’t the case back in the days of the -10s and -11s.

Good point about a low chance of the middle seat being occupied in those days. Sadly (for passengers), that wouldn't be the case so much today...

Other option for the -11 were a 2-4-3 configuration… I can’t see any advantage in that!

I don't mind that, actually. Gives good seating options to groups of 2, 3 and 4 instead of just groups of 3 :)
 
Ah, yes. Ukraine International Airlines and Sunday Airlines (a subsidiary of SCAT in Kazkakhstan) if I recall correctly. Did not look like a fun experience!


Good point about a low chance of the middle seat being occupied in those days. Sadly (for passengers), that wouldn't be the case so much today...



I don't mind that, actually. Gives good seating options to groups of 2, 3 and 4 instead of just groups of 3 :)
Air Mauritius also had a seat map for 2-4-2 at the rear of their 767s. I can’t vouch for it as I never saw it in operation to/from Australia or the SIN/KUL rotation. Maybe it was on dedicated flights to India?

The 2-4-3 configuration on the MD-11s though… poor person sitting in the window if two strangers had the middle aisle :( No different to the current 3-3 or 3-3-3 configurations though… although I avoid those!
 
Had the misfortune to be in the middle seat of the 5 on a flight Honolulu to Vancouver, Continental. Guessing it was a DC-10. It was full of Canadians going back home after holidaying in Hawaii, raucous bunch as well. :)

Not the worst flight I have ever had, but close!
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I’m sure Ryanair have asked the aircraft manufacturers how they could do it, but haven’t yet implemented ‘column’ seating along the longitude of the plane rather than rows.
1674792092981.jpeg

Aisle space is ‘saved’ from the airline perspective because that’s where the pax knees and legs go.
1674792294298.jpeg

You only need to climb over 30 people to get to the ‘toilet’. 😀
“HERComfort class”
 
Last edited:
I’m sure Ryanair have asked the airlines how they could do it, but haven’t yet implemented ‘column’ seating along the longitude of the plane rather than rows.
View attachment 315195

Aisle space is ‘saved’ from the airline perspective because that’s where the pax knees and legs go.
View attachment 315201

You only need to climb over 30 people to get to the ‘toilet’. 😀
“HERComfort class”
Forward, starboard side is “Business Class” with no one stepping over you… BYO ear defenders!
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top