hossein_au
Established Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2013
- Posts
- 1,711
Well thanks for your personal impression there Burmans ...
I think I've already indicated my position.
What I am trying to achieve ? Gee, I thought it was obvious ...
What I do think will happen with involving the FOS, is that BW will be forced to 'take a look' at themselves.
If what they have done is common in the banking world, then that will come out, and I'll be advised by the FOS.
If I had no chance at all, of gaining anything from this situation - then I expected the FOS to have stated that 'up front'. They did not.
If the FOS deal with 'the banking world' all the time, and they know what is 'ok' and what is not - then I expected the FOS to state such an outlook 'up front'. They did not.
If BW fully believe, that they are 100% correct in their actions against me - and so do X number of posters here - then I wonder WHY BW have allocated a 'special case manager' to me.
If 'no means no', then why are they bothering to 'entertain' me ....
I wish you success, but in the world of arbitration no one tells you 'up front' how things are going to go. And no one is going to say what is 'ok' or not; that is the whole point of arbitration. I hope this arbitration does not turn into litigation.
You obviously have made up your mind and there is no changing it. I wish you success.
Me, over and out.