Firstly, not sure if this is the correct place to post this, if not can somebody please move it.
I had a thought this morning while reading a thread about chairman's lounge membership and dreaming about what I would need to do/achieve to get there myself one day. I wondered if any of the legally knowledgeable in this community could comment on how close such schemes are to be considered bribery? Take the company I work for as an example. Most of our contracts are with large government departments. If we started our own "Chairman's Lounge" for our favourite customers (i.e the guys who make the decisions on major tenders) and lets say offered them free 5 star catering when ever they happened to be passing our offices (on personal or work journeys) etc. I think our lawyers would say a big cautious No. So why are airlines different? Why are they allowed to give perks to government (for example) decision makers, when our company makes it very clear to us that anything above the value of a bottle of wine at Christmas needs to be approved by legal?
I guess to a lesser extent standard FF schemes for business travel, which incentivise employees to fly with a certain airline rather than the one on the day that is best for their company for their own personal gain, are similarly questionable?
This is just a fun hypothetical question. I have no plans to bring down QFF (why would I want to when one day, I might even make WP!?)
I had a thought this morning while reading a thread about chairman's lounge membership and dreaming about what I would need to do/achieve to get there myself one day. I wondered if any of the legally knowledgeable in this community could comment on how close such schemes are to be considered bribery? Take the company I work for as an example. Most of our contracts are with large government departments. If we started our own "Chairman's Lounge" for our favourite customers (i.e the guys who make the decisions on major tenders) and lets say offered them free 5 star catering when ever they happened to be passing our offices (on personal or work journeys) etc. I think our lawyers would say a big cautious No. So why are airlines different? Why are they allowed to give perks to government (for example) decision makers, when our company makes it very clear to us that anything above the value of a bottle of wine at Christmas needs to be approved by legal?
I guess to a lesser extent standard FF schemes for business travel, which incentivise employees to fly with a certain airline rather than the one on the day that is best for their company for their own personal gain, are similarly questionable?
This is just a fun hypothetical question. I have no plans to bring down QFF (why would I want to when one day, I might even make WP!?)
Last edited: