FAA grounds 737 Max 9 Aircraft Indefinitely after Alaska Airlines incident

jrfsp

Established Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2021
Posts
1,844
Qantas
Platinum
Virgin
Silver
very lucky there were no fatalities, brand new max

 

Attachments

  • 79683359-12932631-image-a-79_1704519872695.jpg
    79683359-12932631-image-a-79_1704519872695.jpg
    75.8 KB · Views: 29
So it’s not an active Emergency Exit apparently, a plugged non used exit. Either way, expect all MAX’s with this plugged exit to be grounded until checked.

Boeing still walking the tightrope. They can consider themselves lucky nobody got sucked out that window from that seat. They can also count their blessings the flying debris didn’t impact an important aircraft part on the way out. Certainly is bad news for them considering it’s factory fresh. A 10-20 year old aircraft or something, most would just write it off as a once off, and the world moves on, but they cannot afford continue manufacturing blunders like this, Airbus don’t seem to have as many, or any issues.

I hope they get the 777X right.

 
Last edited:
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements


A passenger plane lost a section of its fuselage in mid-air, forcing it to make an emergency landing in the US state of Oregon on Friday.
The Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 returned to Portland 35 minutes into its flight to California after an outer section, including a window, fell.
Alaska said 177 passengers and crew were on board and it "landed safely".
The airline said it would "temporarily" ground all 65 of its 737 Max 9 aircraft to conduct inspections.

1704532303686.png

1704532397824.png

Luckily the window seat was empty at the time - it does not look like an in flight upgrade to an exit row would be a pleasant experience.
 
Last edited:
It seems to be a modification of later 737-9s?

Operators can choose the door if it's a needed exit door. Or have the door "plugged" if it's not needed. It depends on pax seating configurations.

A selling point, apparently.
 
Yes, it looks like Alaska are impacted as they are not using the exit door in their configuration. It does prompt a couple of questions:

- How many other operators are impacted if the mechanism/design proves to be faulty?
- Is this same mechanism used in any other 737 versions/use cases?
 
It seems to be a modification of later 737-9s?

Operators can choose the door if it's a needed exit door. Or have the door "plugged" if it's not needed. It depends on pax seating configurations.

A selling point, apparently.
Some are now claiming that it is still a door just ‘inactive’ with normal interior on the inside.

The purpose is for the lessor/owner to be able to hold the value, or opt for seat increase, at a future date.

Point still to be confirmed howver. Some are still advising it’s not a door and a special ‘plug’
 
Some are now claiming that it is still a door just ‘inactive’ with normal interior on the inside.

The purpose is for the lessor/owner to be able to hold the value, or opt for seat increase, at a future date.

Point still to be confirmed howver. Some are still advising it’s not a door and a special ‘plug’
Correct it’s not needed as an emergency exit so it’s been plugged
 
Has the door/fuselage panel been located on the ground yet?
 
Last edited:
I'm due to fly this aircraft with AS in a couple of weeks.
Hope they sort it out by then.
 
So it’s not an active Emergency Exit apparently, a plugged non used exit. Either way, expect all MAX’s with this plugged exit to be grounded until checked.

Boeing still walking the tightrope. They can consider themselves lucky nobody got sucked out that window from that seat. They can also count their blessings the flying debris didn’t impact an important aircraft part on the way out. Certainly is bad news for them considering it’s factory fresh. A 10-20 year old aircraft or something, most would just write it off as a once off, and the world moves on, but they cannot afford continue manufacturing blunders like this, Airbus don’t seem to have as many, or any issues.

I hope they get the 777X right.

That video of the lights outside the plane through a missing door is so surreal.
 
Inactive/ plugged or not.. emergency doors shouldn't be able to blow out while flying, the external pressure is meant to keep them tight.


That's the thing. It isn't an emergency door. It's a plug where an emergency door could optionally be.

Apparently it's just a usual panel on the cabin interior.

Of course, it shouldn't "blow out".

It doesn't even seem to exist on some versions of the 737-9.
 
Last edited:

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Currently Active Users

Back
Top