Kiwi Lawyer attempts to claim tax refund on $0 Jetstar fares

henrus

Established Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Posts
3,691
Qantas
Platinum
Virgin
Platinum

Stuff article explains it all but in short this really bored and dumb Kiwi lawyer decided to purchase the return for free tickets that JQ offers with a max bundle, call and cancel for a voucher on the first flight only leaving the second flight in place. He's now claiming they owe him a refund on the Australian taxes of the $0 fare totalling about $3500.

I really hope Jetstar both wins and bans him. Not only does it ruin it for everyone but also makes Jetstar tighten up restrictions on sales like these.

Best case scenario for the person involved is that he wins however if they do ban him the whole dumb idea will backfire as he could get banned from one of the only two domestic mainline carriers in New Zealand (and across the Tasman the QF group now makes up a huge percentage of seats).
 
Vry rns nd rpt
(Very rinse and repeat)

He now has 59 Auckland - Sydney tics which he paid $0 for and expects JQ to refund the taxes in full

Gttng bld frm stn
(Blood from a stone)
 
Vry rns nd rpt
(Very rinse and repeat)

He now has 59 Auckland - Sydney tics which he paid $0 for and expects JQ to refund the taxes in full

Gttng bld frm stn
(Blood from a stone)
In some jurisdictions non revenue fares have nil or little real govt regulatory taxes/fees. Once you add an airline cost~fare(e.g. YQ) the govt regulatory taxes/fees apply~jump.
Which is why in USA can have just $5.60 tax, on some award flights, that cannot be avoided. " A September 11th Security Fee of $5.60 per one-way trip, per passenger". The USA award flight is treated as non revenue.
 
More like he is doing himself a service by voluntarily awarding himself Air NZ and Emirates for life 🤣 🤣
The banned list seems to be shared across the Qantas group and Emirates given how tight of partners they are, I can't remember if it was on AFF or FlyerTalk but I recall seeing a post from someone who was banned on Qantas but trying to fly Emirates without luck.
 

Stuff article explains it all but in short this really bored and dumb Kiwi lawyer decided to purchase the return for free tickets that JQ offers with a max bundle, call and cancel for a voucher on the first flight only leaving the second flight in place. He's now claiming they owe him a refund on the Australian taxes of the $0 fare totalling about $3500.

I really hope Jetstar both wins and bans him. Not only does it ruin it for everyone but also makes Jetstar tighten up restrictions on sales like these.

Best case scenario for the person involved is that he wins however if they do ban him the whole dumb idea will backfire as he could get banned from one of the only two domestic mainline carriers in New Zealand (and across the Tasman the QF group now makes up a huge percentage of seats).
Doesn't help that they are called kiwis (and the kiwi bird doesn't appear all that bright either🥝🐥)
The banned list seems to be shared across the Qantas group and Emirates given how tight of partners they are, I can't remember if it was on AFF or FlyerTalk but I recall seeing a post from someone who was banned on Qantas but trying to fly Emirates without luck.
Being ousted even by a MIDDLE EASTERN airline. Lifetime achievement unlocked🤣🤣
 
Probably cost more than that offer,
But I'd give him a voucher for a one way flight to HEL.

On condition that he doesn't do it again, and doesn't speak to media.
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Maybe he’s trying to make the point that the return isn’t actually ‘free’? That at least a component of it has been paid for by a higher one way fare than normal?

So maybe the upshot is that we no longer have ‘return for free’ sales, but sales that are accurately reflected in the fares? That’s probably a good thing.
 
Maybe he’s trying to make the point that the return isn’t actually ‘free’? That at least a component of it has been paid for by a higher one way fare than normal?

So maybe the upshot is that we no longer have ‘return for free’ sales, but sales that are accurately reflected in the fares? That’s probably a good thing.
He's an idiot, wasting court time and cost like that. He can't be very busy
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Staff online

Back
Top