Ansett
Established Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
- Posts
- 4,055
- Qantas
- Platinum 1
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Emerald
Will be interesting to see what CASA finds and if they do ground the fleet.
If the fleet is grounded would Qantas and Virgin step in?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Have a SYD-WGA flight booked for Thursday morning, should I have some concern?
Both.Concern over grounding or concern over crashing?
Very interesting times ahead. I don’t think a lot of people realise just how much it would affect regional areas. Close to 30 flights a day just from little old ADL alone. I would be guessing the government would have to put their hands in the their pockets to some extent for the meantime but not sure where the equipment would come fromIt's not a great situation as many regional towns across Australia rely on Rex services.
But I do have to wonder whether Rex's business is really sustainable. They have an ageing fleet of Saab 340 aircraft which are no longer being produced and Rex doesn't seem to have any plan to replace these planes. The plan to introduce security screening at small regional airports (for which Rex would probably have to burden some or all of the cost) doesn't help with their ongoing profitability either.
Either way, if Rex does get grounded, it will lead to significant changes to regional aviation in this country.
Same thought crossed my mind in last few weeks. Where does a regional airline buy/lease a modern low cost of ownership/operation 30-50 seater nowadays?The issue is the lack of suitable replacement aircraft.
There just aren't any 30-50 seat props in production.
The US regionals do use smaller Embraer ERJs but they are more expensive to purchase and operate.
Will be interesting to see what CASA finds and if they do ground the fleet.
If the fleet is grounded would Qantas and Virgin step in?
rex has always had issues with unions. I think they would prefer all employees were non-unionist. With the recession, could this happen ?CASA isn't known for having any balls with regard to larger airlines, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's happy to bully a smaller one. Much of what I see around the word relates to regulators who have been weak for years, suddenly coming to life as the horse bolts out of the door. The MAX is perhaps the best example at the moment. If regulation were working properly, problems would be nipped in the bud...
How? I expect that neither have spare aircraft sitting around, so those smaller places that don't get multiple airlines servicing them now, would, most likely, end up with nothing. At other places, seats would dry up, and prices would rise accordingly. There wouldn't suddenly be extra capacity.
"The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has confirmed it has no current issues with the safety of REX aircraft.”“REX maintenance engineering staff were randomly selected by CASA and interviewed. All of them said that they felt confident in reporting maintenance errors or defects,and they indicated REX operated according to ‘just culture’ principles.”
, andRex has nothing but contempt for the efforts of some media outlets to generate more sales through malicious attacks on its airline safety record based on biased and anecdotal accusations by anonymous disgruntled staff
Rex has no doubt that these tabloids will continue to try to sully Rex’s reputation and indeed a tabloid has yesterday already made xenophobic comments about Rex’s management.
Rex media releases, however, are always good for a laugh.
I'm often shocked by what I read in Rex press releases. They're not winning any friends with this kind of rhetoric.
For the B737s, looks like Rex is sending them to XSP for maintenance: