anat0l
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,926
- Qantas
- LT Silver
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Ruby
- Star Alliance
- Gold
We don't feel that we're entitled to it. All we want is a fair price for airfares instead of the gouging that is going on. Why should people who live up here be put at a disadvantage because of FIFO workers? Looking at the most expensive one way fare of $650 at $1.02/mile I'm not sure that people wanting to fly SYD-PER would be happy to pay an economy fare of $2074 one way.
No, but the mining companies don't have a near-complete carte blanche on the capacity of the flights between Perth and the Eastern capitals. Yet.... (and may it never get to that point)
It's an unfortunate supply and demand affair. You may like to say it's another unfortunate consequence of the FIFO system (viz. FIFO really investing more into local economies? Not really........ but there's a lot more to this argument, much beyond this thread)
Jokes aside, I'm surprised that some of the smaller charter airlines don't try and run little commuter services for the Pilbara. Probably they might be swamped by mining company business too.
Heaven forbid, if the mining in the Pilbara folded up tomorrow, you might see prices on flights drop finally. Then again, they may stay much the same since a higher price will be required to pay for the flight (with potentially less people on board) - the "regional flights" syndrome - or you'll find reductions in service frequency (or, perhaps, downgauges to Q400 / B717 aircraft).
If QF or DJ had the power to do much, what could they do? Set aside inventory at a lower price for residents etc.? Mining companies would probably blow up over that one - they want those seats. How many should they set aside per flight/day/week? How much should they cost? (Everyone these days is claiming that if I can get it cheaper elsewhere, you're ripping me off.) Should we also make a note for private contractors, non-mining businesses (including, for example, public services and charities)? I suppose in order to secure that inventory, you'd need to call QF or DJ, fax or somehow present a proof of residency in the Pilbara (e.g. a phone or electricity bill, or driver's license) before you can purchase a ticket.
Perhaps mining companies should be lobbied, within their social obligations to the communities being affected by their operations, they assist with subsidies etc. to allow residents to economically use services such as flights to and from PER. After all, they are (indirectly, but still) responsible for creating other skewed realities, like the costs of groceries.
Why should a privately owned company sacrifice their own profits just to be nice to local residents who choose to live in a certain location?
Kind of depends on whether those said residents were there before or after the mining commenced (either in planning, construction or operational phases). Then there's always the argument of the changing dynamics of the business, environment and community.
After all, is it really just profit, profit, profit and nothing else matters?