Kiwi Flyer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2004
- Posts
- 5,453
What do you reckon?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
There is no restriction regarding coasts as far as I am aware. If they want to purchase 777-200LR or A340-500 aircraft there is nothing stopping them overflying the Oz east coast and/or USA west coast. Except that they cannot use the name Virgin due to a contractual constraint put in place by Mr Branson several years back (hence the name Pacific Blue and Polynesian Blue for international services).bigjobs said:the interesting thing though is that Virgin are currently allowed to fly from the east coast of Oz to the West Coast of the USA and there was an ever so slight hint that they might one day take that route up.
NM said:bigjobs said:Except that they cannot use the name Virgin due to a contractual constraint put in place by Mr Branson several years back (hence the name Pacific Blue and Polynesian Blue for international services).
OK - No Virgin until Sir Richard agrees - so fly Pacific Blue instead (it is the Pacific Ocean) What about having "blue" in the name? Any trademark infringment in the US with Jet Blue??
No problems using Pacific Blue name, which is the obvious choice should they choose to fly the route. But obviously not with their current fleet of 737 aircraft. And introducing a new aircraft type would break away from the original low-cost model they chose.dajop said:OK - No Virgin until Sir Richard agrees - so fly Pacific Blue instead (it is the Pacific Ocean) What about having "blue" in the name? Any trademark infringment in the US with Jet Blue??
Agreed. It certainly wouldn't be the first backflit Jetstar has made.danielh said:I think that a suitable counter to the Virgin effect is to allow earning dicounted FF points on DISCOUNTED Jetstar flights. This may help contain the riff-raff and prevent bleeding on the cheaper airline.