Loyalty Program Devaluations Are Inevitable, But Not Giving Notice Is Poor Form

Avianca Airbus A320 at Bogota Airport
Avianca’s LifeMiles program is one of several to recently raise award costs without notice. Photo: Matt Graham.

More and more, frequent flyer programs are increasing reward prices without giving any notice.

Changes to award charts are inevitable. Every loyalty program increases the cost of redemptions from time to time, and often it’s reasonable. But it’s reprehensible when loyalty programs have such little respect for their members that they don’t bother to inform them in advance. Many aren’t even advising members after making changes, either.

Recent frequent flyer program devaluations

This week, both Avianca LifeMiles and Qatar Airways Privilege Club increased the cost of various award flight redemptions without notice. For example, LifeMiles increased the cost of trans-Atlantic First Class redemptions from 87,000 to 130,000 miles overnight.

Meanwhile, Qatar Airways Privilege Club just significantly increased the cost of short-haul award flights on American Airlines and Alaska Airlines. It follows a similar change from British Airways Executive Club last month, which also came with absolutely no warning.

Virgin Atlantic Flying Club, too, has twice increased selected award prices this year without warning. First it was ANA redemptions in May, then Delta rewards last month.

Malaysia Airlines Enrich devalued without notice in February 2024.

United MileagePlus

United MileagePlus is another serial offender. Several times this year, United Airlines has significantly increased the cost of award flights on partner airlines without any notice at all. For example, in May, United suddenly increased the cost of Star Alliance Business Class flights from Australia to Asia from 55,000 miles to 99,000 miles each way.

Thai Airways A350 Business Class seat
Overnight, a Thai Airways Business Class redemption from Australia to Asia cost almost double the number of United miles. Photo: Matt Graham.

Etihad Guest

Etihad Guest, too, has increased the cost of award flights on both Etihad Airways and partner airlines this year. The program gave zero notice before making these changes. Afterwards, it only publicised the fact that some award costs had gone down. That was true, but others had gone up, and the worst part was that Etihad then tried to pretend that some of those negative changes never happened. When Australian Frequent Flyer asked Etihad about this, they were not “able” to comment.

Some of Etihad Guest’s price changes have been quite drastic, with award flights on some routes increasing in cost by up to 150% overnight.

To make matters worse, Etihad Guest no longer even follows its own published award charts. Many Etihad Guest redemptions now cost more than the advertised number of miles, both on Etihad and partner airlines, for no apparent reason. The taxes & charges on Virgin Australia redemptions have also gone up significantly, without explanation.

Etihad Guest redemption from MEL to DPS flying Virgin Australia or Garuda
Virgin Australia and Garuda redemptions are supposed to use the exact same Etihad Guest award chart. So why does the Garuda flight cost more miles on the Etihad website?

This list of recent frequent flyer program devaluations is not exhaustive. Sadly, there have been so many lately that I’ve started to lose track of them all.

Moving goal posts

Members of frequent flyer programs earn points – and sometimes even buy them – because they believe they’ll be able to use them for valuable rewards. Many people save up their points with a particular redemption in mind.

We’re not saying that frequent flyer programs should never change the number of points or miles needed for a redemption. But when they do change the goal posts, the least they can do is inform members in advance. That way, people at least have a chance to redeem their accrued points at the value they believed they were going to get. It’s also just a basic courtesy.

When loyalty programs change the goal posts without warning, they profit off this. The value of the points sitting in your account reduces overnight, decreasing the airline’s liability, without the airline giving anything in return to its members. And many programs aren’t even giving the courtesy of telling their members when they do this.

Sadly, this seems to be the way many frequent flyer programs are heading – particularly the ones that no longer publish award charts. By removing award charts, airlines seem to think it gives them a licence to increase award costs whenever they like.

In my view, this is poor form. When did loyalty program members decide that they were OK with this?

Loyalty program members can vote with their feet

Airlines may profit in the short term by reducing the value of members’ points. But in the long term, the risk is that members will start to disengage and move their business to other airlines once they realise what’s going on.

This year alone, I’ve burned most of the miles I had left in my United MileagePlus and Etihad Guest loyalty program accounts as a direct result of the continuous devaluations without notice. I’ve also stopped actively collecting new miles with these airlines. As a program member, I don’t like what I see and I no longer trust that my miles in these programs won’t lose even more value tomorrow.

Etihad A380
An Etihad Airways Airbus A380. Photo: Matt Graham.

In recent times, I’ve also stopped drawing attention on AFF to offers from United MileagePlus, Avianca LifeMiles and Etihad Guest to buy miles at a discount. I’ve done this because I don’t want to recommend buying miles from an airline that could change the value of those miles at a moment’s notice. How can you buy miles with confidence if you have no idea what they will be worth tomorrow?

Buying miles from United, Avianca or Etihad can still be great value, and there are circumstances where it could still make sense. But if you don’t redeem them immediately, it’s also risky. Why take that risk when other programs, such as Air Canada Aeroplan, have published award charts that they actually stick to?

What can we learn from this?

I think there are two lessons we can take away from all of this…

Don’t hoard points – spend them!

Firstly, don’t hoard frequent flyer points. They are not an investment as they don’t earn interest and ultimately lose value over time! In fact, the inflation rate on points is quite high.

You (hopefully) wouldn’t put all your savings into a bank account that earns no interest for years on end. So, why would you do this with your points?

Points only have value when you redeem them, and you’ll likely get more redeeming them now than in several years. In my view, a huge points balance isn’t a sign of status – it’s a sign that you need to spend more of them. 😉

Q-streaming entertainment on QantasLink's A220 business class
Go ahead – spend your points! Photo: Qantas.

Look for loyalty programs that give notice of devaluations

The good news is that many frequent flyer programs do still publish award charts and have the decency to warn members in advance before changing them. You can tell which ones these are based on the program’s terms and conditions, as well as their past performance.

For example, the Qantas Frequent Flyer terms & conditions state that the program will give at least three months’ notice of any changes to “Qantas Points earning and redeeming rates” that are within Qantas’ control. That’s a good thing, and Qantas has indeed given that notice period before making negative changes in the past.

Here are the policies of various major frequent flyer programs:

Loyalty programMust give notice of changes?Notice period
Qantas Frequent FlyerYes3 months
Velocity Frequent FlyerYes30 days
Singapore Airlines KrisFlyerNoIn practice, KrisFlyer has given about a month of notice in the past
Cathay Asia MilesNoIn practice, Cathay has given ~3 months of notice in the past
Air New Zealand AirpointsNo
Qatar Airways Privilege ClubNo
British Airways Executive ClubNo
Air Canada AeroplanYes2-3 months
Avianca LifeMilesNo
Etihad GuestNo
Emirates SkywardsNo
Virgin Atlantic Flying ClubNo

As you can see, Qantas and Velocity are more reasonable than many overseas frequent flyer programs in this respect.

In practice, Singapore Airlines KrisFlyer and Cathay Asia Miles have also given at least a month of warning before upcoming devaluations in the past. That said, KrisFlyer removed a lot of Saver award availability after giving notice of its last devaluation – returning it after the price increase took effect. And Cathay did not announce its new partner award pricing until after the change had taken effect.

Many of the loyalty programs that may make devaluations without notice are still valuable and worth using overall. It’s just something to be mindful of.

Spread the risk with flexible points programs

If you’re earning most of your points from credit cards, you can reduce your risk by keeping your points in a flexible bank-operated loyalty program where points don’t expire and the bank must give notice before changing redemption rates. This means you’re not stuck with a single airline’s points in the event that airline does make drastic changes to its loyalty program overnight.

The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 90 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil & Kazakhstan. His interests include aviation, economics & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can connect with Matt by posting on the Australian Frequent Flyer community forum and tagging @AFF Editor.
________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

I used to love United MileagePlus... but I haven't touched the program for years given the long line of changes. Etihad's latest changes (which even require a flight each year to keep points alive, not just earning / spending activity) are so terrible that I've gone from a top tier member in the program to one with no status and no miles - completely disengaged.

Even KrisFlyer's approach isn't great, especially given how the conversion rates from the banks to KrisFlyer have all worsened in recent times, and there's the mileage expiry on top. Having only ~3 weeks notice of changes isn't great.

I have access to so many reward programs that might look good on paper, but some have quite big red flags attached like these no notice changes. Many will disagree, but I genuinely find the most usable program to be QFF. Points are so easy to earn in Australia right across the board, and when it comes to spending them, the unwritten 'request a seat' feature is an absolute game changer. (Obviously, I'm at a status level where that's possible, but still.) When I know that my points aren't just going to suddenly become worth a lot less overnight, I feel comfortable earning more and holding more. There's a reason that Qantas Loyalty is usually more popular than the airline itself!

Reply 6 Likes

click to expand...

Etihad's latest changes (which even require a flight each year to keep points alive, not just earning / spending activity) are so terrible that I've gone from a top tier member in the program to one with no status and no miles - completely disengaged.

As I commented in another thread, now that Seat Son lives in Abu Dhabi rather than Dubai, I was looking at the status match offered by Etihad as it might have been more convenient to fly in and out of AUH rather than DXB. But this sort of thing really puts me off @ChrisFlyer and I probably won't bother now.

Reply Like

click to expand...

Although it has been historic practice, I disagree with the notion that redemption charges should increase over time.

Points are generally earned based on distance travelled. If I take 10 Sydney-Adelaide return trips with QF in Y, I earn 24000 points. That is enough for a return award trip in Y. A 10% bonus.

If the redemption charge increases to say 36000 points, I would need to make 15 return trips, giving only a 6.7% bonus.

If the airlines increase the redemption charges, they should also increase the earning rates.

Reply 3 Likes

Although it has been historic practice, I disagree with the notion that redemption charges should increase over time.

Points are generally earned based on distance travelled. If I take 10 Sydney-Adelaide return trips with QF in Y, I earn 24000 points. That is enough for a return award trip in Y. A 10% bonus.

If the redemption charge increases to say 36000 points, I would need to make 15 return trips, giving only a 6.7% bonus.

If the airlines increase the redemption charges, they should also increase the earning rates.

Agree with the above. I also never understood the rationale. That is because the underlying fares paying for the points earned have similarly increased over time. So they have earned more revenue to pay for those points.

Now, maybe lately more points have come from external sources than flights - but then I'd also expect them to have increased in cost over time as well. It appears to be double dipping when the cost to earn has gone up, as well as the cost to redeem.

Reply Like

click to expand...

Agree with the above. I also never understood the rationale. That is because the underlying fares paying for the points earned have similarly increased over time. So they have earned more revenue to pay for those points.

Now, maybe lately more points have come from external sources than flights - but then I'd also expect them to have increased in cost over time as well. It appears to be double dipping when the cost to earn has gone up, as well as the cost to redeem.

Yes, of course it's double dipping. Qantas sell points to xyz bank and abc merchant who in turn reward their good customers with those points. Qantas banks that cash that they received from selling the points straight away & presumably earns interest on the money. The person receiving those points usually will keep them for a period of time before use - sometimes suffering a devaluation along the way. Why should that be? In my book it's unjustified. It's similar to gift cards that expire after a time. Is there any other industry that preys on identifiable loyal customers so shamelessly as do airlines via their FF programs? Talk about over promising and under delivering!

Reply Like

click to expand...

Although it has been historic practice, I disagree with the notion that redemption charges should increase over time.

Points are generally earned based on distance travelled. If I take 10 Sydney-Adelaide return trips with QF in Y, I earn 24000 points. That is enough for a return award trip in Y. A 10% bonus.

If the redemption charge increases to say 36000 points, I would need to make 15 return trips, giving only a 6.7% bonus.

If the airlines increase the redemption charges, they should also increase the earning rates.

If points have a certain dollar value when earned what justification is there that enables them to be devalued? I'm glad that our AUD hasn't fallen at the same rate!
In the years leading up until recent price rises it seemed to me that cash prices for tickets rarely changed other than seasonally or even appeared to get cheaper in some instances whilst points were harder to use and surcharges blunted the overall benefit anyway when you did score a classic reward or equivalent

Reply Like

click to expand...