RB
Established Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- Posts
- 4,279
Saw this opinion posted in the SMH & thought it was pretty measured
- DonNov 24 2017 at 11:06pm
Where the disappointment is after 2 days of 5 (with Australia to bat last) is that yet again England have dominated technically.
Bowling lengths can be adjusted by coughmins, Starc and Hazelwood who will remain dangerous, spin bowling variation is clearly in England's favor and will remain so
'Keeping is about even - but potential runs may give England the edge
But, England have worked over our batting line up, noting both Bancroft and Handscomb played County cricket last winter with, at best, average results, both averaging in the low 30's.
So England have worked out Bancroft, Warner, Khawaja and Handscomb by attacking their technique deficiencies - which is a very real problem
And they have multiple plans for Smith, getting him hooking or pulling or 6th Stump line
Marsh has survived - but he knicks
What is obvious is that we must identify players with excellent batting technique, front foot and back foot and with excellent application.
The reason for this is because it is shown that England will work you over technically, honing in on any deficiency (and anyone we select will receive the same attention hence technique is an absolute necessity)
A good ball will get you, but it has to be a very good ball not because of a technical deficiency England identify and attack
So batting spots are up for grabs
This is Test cricket at its fiercest so opportunity to belt the ball over the park will be absent.
You have to survive to prosper.
If you have not got the technique to survive the examination there is no place for you in Test cricket.
This is the problem with the morphing of short form cricket with Test selection.
We are selecting the wrong batsmen - and elsewhere talking up the wrong batsmen