A bit of humour

[TheRealTMA]

 

[drron]

Well there goes the next trip.
.

 

[TheRealTMA]

Well there goes the next trip.
View attachment 216230.

Just as well. “Apparently “ they are a reservoir for Coronavirus!

https://nypost.com/2020/04/19/testicl_s-may-make-men-more-vulnerable-to-coronavirus-study/

 

[p--and--t]

 

[TheRealTMA]

Too many to post individually.

Sjov Familie

joke.guru

 

[love_the_life]

Too many to post individually.

Sjov Familie

joke.guru

No Groan emoticon

 

[Deleted member]

View attachment 216242

Now that’s funny

 

[p--and--t]

Not sure if this is the right thread?

Post automatically merged: Apr 26, 2020

 

[p--and--t]

Have you heard the rumour that Mexico now wishes they'd funded the wall after all?

 

[get me outta here]

It is the right thread sadly. Apparently we / they are listening to science at the moment. Just for some things, not for others.

Not sure if this is the right thread?

View attachment 216263

Post automatically merged: Apr 26, 2020

View attachment 216264

 

[JohnM]

Just as well. “Apparently “ they are a reservoir for Coronavirus!

https://nypost.com/2020/04/19/testicl_s-may-make-men-more-vulnerable-to-coronavirus-study/

Hey, send that to Monash Uni - they'll describes that in slightly more reductionist science detail and then claim a "world-first reimagined set of technological tools breakthrough that is greeted enthusiastically worldwide for its more nuanced approach and hailed as potentially huge benefit that plays a central role in a bid to outsmart covid-19" - all of which implies, but does not in any way deliver, a cure

No worries - leave it to us rent-seekers to put it on the 'we just need to understand it in more detail and then we'll have a cure', while you dopey deplorables try to figure out what we just said...

But, hey, what would I know? - I've been a research scientist for only 50 years...

 

[p--and--t]

But, hey, what would I know? - I've been a research scientist for only 50 years...

Sorry too old school, things are different now

 

[TheRealTMA]

Hey, send that to Monash Uni - they'll describes that in slightly more reductionist science detail and then claim a "world-first reimagined set of technological tools breakthrough that is greeted enthusiastically worldwide for its more nuanced approach and hailed as potentially huge benefit that plays a central role in a bid to outsmart covid-19" - all of which implies, but does not in any way deliver, a cure

No worries - leave it to us rent-seekers to put it on the 'we just need to understand it in more detail and then we'll have a cure', while you dopey deplorables try to figure out what we just said...

But, hey, what would I know? - I've been a research scientist for only 50 years...

Well, you know, the only way to be sure is to resort to code 2 and remove them!

 

[p--and--t]

Woman: Oh woe is us, we bear children
Men: We carry kids in our nuts our whole life, y’all do it for just 9 months. No comparison.

 

[p--and--t]

 

[p--and--t]

 

[drron]

Just as well. “Apparently “ they are a reservoir for Coronavirus!

https://nypost.com/2020/04/19/testicl_s-may-make-men-more-vulnerable-to-coronavirus-study/

Though not everyone believes that.
.

 

[TheRealTMA]

Though not everyone believes that.
.

Looks like a case of nominative determinism as well.

 

[TheRealTMA]

from Facebook with acknowledgement to Leunig.

 

[p--and--t]