Air India 777 diversion in Russia

jb747

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Posts
12,542
A few days ago, a 777 that was overflying Russia on the way to the USA was forced to divert to an airport within Russia. The recovery aircraft has been allowed to depart Russia, direct to the USA, but I wonder how AI will go about getting their aircraft back. Pretty much any parts they may need will be subject to sanctions, and if it's an engine, it may prove doubly problematic.
 
It hasn’t been touched on much here, but I’ve been following this as it’s fascinating at a lot of levels:

- how serious was the engine issue that that was their only option (noting flight route / diversion options are presumably limited)
- how well the local airport did (IMO) in accomodating passengers as best they could (or not as one’s individual viewpoint may be)
- recovery flight deployment
- recovery of aircraft (tbc…..)

Presumably there is some (?official) way to get around the sanctions but i cant imagine that’s easy or cheap or fast. It probably helps that India have “better” relations with Russia currently than other countries (Although how much that helps remains to be seen).
 
Pretty much any parts they may need will be subject to sanctions
There are likely many exceptions (official and unofficial) in the "sanctions". Likely an export license will be needed for whatever parts.
The problem is if an engine is required, then what aircraft can carry them? Possibly the Ukranian Antonovs?

Does the 777 have a pod for a 3rd engine?
 
Last edited:
There are likely many exceptions (official and unofficial) in the "sanctions". Likely an export license will be needed for whatever parts.
The problem is if an engine is required, then what aircraft can carry them? Possibly the Ukranian Antonovs?

Does the 777 have a pod for a 3rd engine?
Wouldn't imagine so due to drag issues.
 
avherald
An Air India Boeing 777-200, registration VT-ALH performing flight AI-173 from Delhi (India) to San Francisco,CA (USA) with 216 passengers and 16 crew, was enroute at FL350 about 650nm north of Magadan (Russia) when the crew decided to turn around reporting problems with the right hand engine (GE90). The aircraft maintained FL350 on the way back, but about 140nm north of Magadan the crew decided to divert to Magadan and initiated the descent towards Magadan. The aircraft landed safely on Magadan's runway 10 about 100 minutes after turning around and about 30 minutes after leaving FL350.

The airline reported first the aircraft diverted due to unavoidable reasons and later stated there were technical problems with one of the engines.

The occurrence aircraft is still on the ground in Magadan about 8 hours after landing
 
Tough spot to have an issue. Probably ”worst” point on the route.

~1200mi to Sapporo (possibly best non-russia location), ~1800mi to ICN, Maybe some options in Northern China (but have to deal with flight paths, entry to china etc) - Harbin ~ 1400mi.. Still 1900mi to ANC.

They were obviously worried enough they landed at closest airport. Good call - keep everyone safe and deal with logistics later.
 
I hope they have someone watching over it. The old part or two going missing is certainly probable!
 
Wow, those oligarchs move pretty slowly, coupla days & they let all those parts they could sell get away? I guess Russia’s pretty big, maybe not so easy to get their hands on a coupla dozen guys with automatic weapons & bribe the airport authorities by not killing them?
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Good result overall.

Wonder what the exact failure was? We may never know. AI will be reluctant for after the event criticism of the need to divert if its perceived as ”minor” (noting my opinion the opposite - flying over a remote part of the world isn’t the place for “it’s minor let’s keep going”…..).
 
I'm assuming the pilots and crew of the original 173 operated the 173D to SFO after a day and a bit rest

And the ferry crew operated back to BOM after a couple days rest?
 
Wonder what the exact failure was? We may never know.
It doesn't look to have involved an engine shutdown, as the section of their track that is shown on FR24 has them at FL350 on the diversion, which is too high for engine out.
I'm assuming the pilots and crew of the original 173 operated the 173D to SFO after a day and a bit rest

And the ferry crew operated back to BOM after a couple days rest?
Probably, but you never know with any form of crew scheduling.
 

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top