rechoboam
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Posts
- 930
On the director's proxy question, what moa999 has posted is correct. There was on average no more than a couple of million proxy votes allocated to chairman's discretion.
A breakdown of QF's biggest shareholders is included in their annual report on pg. 109 (which is the norm for publicly traded entities) which is extracted from the share registry.
I've quickly screen-captured the relevant chunks of that page, as it would be impossibly time consuming to present it here in a tabular form.
View attachment 4389
...
View attachment 4390
Why are the second list not included on the first?
On another note, whatever criticism AJ deserves, QF just has a fundamental problem.
Running a "local" company in a global marketplace is extraordinarily difficult.
If I compare some of the experiences I had on my recent US trip or, say, my last trip to Singapore, to the equivalent restaurant/hotel/airline lounge/limo service in Australia...the local product is severely wanting. With relatively high pay, strong economy, good employment prospects, and a strong societal safety net, frontline staff just don't have the same passion here. And the cost base is so much higher. This isn't necessarily terrible - I'm happy not to be seeing the trailers of day labourers being carted around between building sites like I have seen in Asia and the Middle East - but providing full-service airlines or any luxury product is difficult to do on a competitive basis. I don't see what the solution is and no, I definitely wouldn't want AJ's job.