RichardMEL
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Posts
- 10,082
- Qantas
- Platinum 1
Surely the equal treatment of men and women (which I agree with as a general notion of behaviour) is not really relevant here (despite her posted comment). He was not deemed to be in violation of the DC and she was. Simple as that. Should he have been denied entry because, as her partner/companion, he should share her fate? No, that's clearly not right... so I kind of don't see the issue.
It's all about her clothing being deemed by this one agent at least, as against the DC. It's only "about" him in respect that she dragged him into it when he's dressed differently to her. It would only make sense if they both wore matching outfits - then it would not be fair if he was let in and she wasn't.. otherwise... meh
It's all about her clothing being deemed by this one agent at least, as against the DC. It's only "about" him in respect that she dragged him into it when he's dressed differently to her. It would only make sense if they both wore matching outfits - then it would not be fair if he was let in and she wasn't.. otherwise... meh