Its being sold as a normal revenue flight (as well).
Biz is wide open on EF.
many seats are failing, IFE failing,
Pay market rate for our 17yo plane...no thanks.
I have been on several of these recently (QF27-QF28) and many seats are failing, IFE failing, AC not working etc. I love the 747 but these birds are long past their use-by date.
17 years is not old in this industry. The 767s were 29 years old when they were retired. I miss them.
I never had an issue with 767s...great domestic flights on them however one time SYD-HNL was a bit tough in Y.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Yes. All 6 remaining 747s are the only ERs.Is this the first ER to be retired?
Was there a timeline where the 747s were gone earlier? I didn't think they would be around until the end of 2020?
Are any 747-400ER's being preserved? Or is the one at Albion Park airport (non-ER) the only one that will be preserved by Qantas? I recognize that the average punter won't really care about the difference between ER and non-ER.
The ER was an excellent update to the standard -400. The could still be going strong, but....
If memory serves correctly, there was a bit more power and a bit more weight. So they tend to cancel out. But, it seemed to perform the same at its heavier maximum as the standard aircraft at the lower figure. The pilots, especially those from the 767, had quite a liking for the CF6 engines though, and they had a more sprightly feel to them than the RRs.having flown on them several times recently I still find them to be in very good nick. It’s a joy of an aircraft with a great sound. How did they handle in comparison to the ‘classics’? Bit more sports car like?
The ER was an excellent update to the standard -400. The could still be going strong, but....