anat0l
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,669
I am not asking because I am looking for one—I have never thought about asking for nor ever expected a free upgrade—but after speaking to the parents of a friend who don't fly often and reading Top 10 worst excuses for free upgrades, I am interested in other stories AFF members have heard.
His parents recently flew QF5 to meet us and after their arrival there was the obligatory discussion about the flight during which they complained that when they asked if they could score a free upgrade, were told, "no, sorry the flight is very full." Now, whether this was true or not is irrelevant, but what struck me was what came after. The mother said (to us; thankfully not to the check-in agent) "and I thought, 'yeah, bull****.'" I have this feeling that it isn't uncommon among those that don't fly often to have this mentality. But why is this the case and why is it even at all expected? I expect to get the class of service that I pay for. And if there were op-up opportunities available, I expect it to go to status pax over non-status pax.
Have any AFFers or anyone they know actually tried the tactic of simply asking or making an excuse to score a free upgrade? It would be interesting to know the statistics as it doesn't seem that uncommon which seems to suggest that it does actually work sometimes, otherwise, this mentality or pattern of behaviour would not be as common as it is.
To answer this part, I think it might've been a small holdover from the golden ages of flying, where people used to chat up the CSAs or airline staff to finagle an upgrade that way.
In the modern day context, I would also lay quite a bit of blame on the USA. FF elites in the USA are often entitled to upgrades where space is available. However, this kind of ethos has filtered into the rest of the travelling public. In the USA, it's considered not-too-unusual to ask for an upgrade just to try your chances. (They are very heavily on the side of, "If you don't ask, you don't get"). This is especially true if you are any kind of FF elite. Newspapers and journals publish articles like, "How to increase your chances of an upgrade," with little to no shame (and only one - if any - of those suggestions are actually true). I'll refrain from further criticism of US travelling etiquette and attitude or lack thereof, but that's adding a factor.
The rise of more classes and class system along with the notion of upgrades (i.e. it can be done with instruments or entitlements now, whereas in the old days you really had to pay the next class up to sit in it) has also made a big contribution to people just trying their luck for an upgrade.
The other common arguments of those who are disgruntled after being refused an upgrade are:
- "It's another bl**dy seat, so why can't I just sit in it?"
- "No one's gonna sit there, why can't I?"
- "Why not fill up the cabin rather than let it go empty? That's money you're throwing away."
- "It's not like I'm asking for the world, or a First Class seat."
- "I fly x amount of times on this airline. I must be one of your best customers*. Surely an upgrade would not be too much to ask for?" *(yeah, right)
All of them are flawed IMO and all have good rebuttals which might be worth a separate topic instead.
I am not of the opinion of "if you do not ask you will not receive". The advice is fine by itself but in this context it is flawed. An upgrade is strictly a privilege, not a right. Knowing this, how can you be so shameful as to ask for an upgrade for free if you know that you cannot possibly be automatically entitled to one. If someone asked you for a reason why you should be upgraded for free, I would bet there wouldn't be a good one at all. So I wouldn't waste your time and dignity asking for something you clearly are not entitled to. If you want to be entitled to one, you follow the relevant channels to get one in earnest. Journalists or bloggers who suggest that anyone should ask for an upgrade and not be ashamed to do so are deceiving at best, and frankly I don't want to qualify the worst.
Operational upgrades, I believe, are purely at the whim of the airline. We would like to believe that they are supposed to go to elites first, but this is only true in an ideal world. In reality, operational upgrades would like to be based on status but are primarily fitted according to convenience. Even a UA gate agent regales about op-ups when he worked for the airline (and the US airlines have a fairly strict regimen of fitting elites for operational upgrades, which ends up being more common than not due to overbooking), and a lot of it does come down to slotting for convenience, but these cases should be rare. (If the Swiss cheese holes line up for you today, you just might miss out.) In that light, I treat operational upgrades also as a privilege or a bonus, not a right or a set entitlement. I don't say, "I'm a Platinum and I only got 1 operational upgrade last year therefore so-and-so airline are a bunch of crooks who don't look after their elites," or, "I'm a Platinum and here I am sitting in Economy whilst that bl**dy Silver is sitting in Business got my operational upgrade". It's a simple case of if you get one, you got one, and that's a bonus. If you so happen to have a record of 12 operational upgrades last year, or a rare double-class operational upgrade, then Lady Luck was shining on you. Be grateful; don't think you're more loved.
In conclusion, if you want an upgrade, help yourself to get one. Don't think you can simply finagle one for free. And I'd be disgusted at the attitude of your friend's mother, but I suppose we must cut her some slack because she's simply not aware, especially if she doesn't fly often. (It still embodies a general attitude problem rather than a specific flying etiquette one.)
On a totally unrelated side note: this couple are over 60 and, nothing against them personally, but if they were on my flight seated in an exit row, I would strenuously object. The husband wears a hearing aid, the wife not so mobile and neither of them would satisfy the exit row requirement of being able to lift and throw out an emergency door. They even commented on it themselves (after reading the requirements before paying for the seats) saying that if there actually was an emergency and they needed to open the door, everyone would be screwed. Surely QF should police this more?
Material probably for another thread, but in short since exit rows were commoditised in the view that they are extra leg room seats, I'm hard pressed to find an airline that will actually enforce the real safety rules of emergency exits and reseat people who are not "fit" for sitting there. It doesn't help that the "fitness" of a passenger is not assessed at the time that the seats are selected / purchased (yes there might be a warning - a bit like the Dangerous Goods warning - which doesn't stop anyone).
The FAs might also be in a rock and hard place once passengers board. Unless they overheard the couple admit that they were not "fit", how do you judge someone accurately that they would not be fit for assisting in an emergency landing? (Testing if someone can speak English is easy and one factor, but if they pass that then what else.) How do you do this without "demeaning" the passenger? (This is really big in the US where people who are not quite "fit to fly" have thrown up massive lawsuits or tantrums that make the media.) How do you answer a passenger that says back at you, "Well, are we going to have an emergency today? No? The plane is safe? So what's the big deal in me sitting here? You said we're not going to have an emergency? What do you mean there's a risk? Are you telling me the airline is unsafe?" (and so on and so on...)
On the other side of the fence for airlines, there's nothing too unethical that can't be done to extract more dollars from a passenger, right?