Ask The Pilot

  • Thread starter Thread starter NM
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
are christmas decorations of any kind and/or christmas hats allowed in coughpit?
Decorations in the coughpit would be a waste of time, but strange ties, beards, and hats appear.

do your ATC communications change for these days?

Merry Christmas, etc, is often appended to comms, but overall they remain very professional. You need to remember that not everyone is a native English speaker, and comms should be kept to the standard phrasing as much as possible.

are you able to call home when at cruise to say merry christmas?

No. The aircraft comms are for business. I guess you could make a sat phone call from the cabin if you felt like putting your credit card details into the system, but I don't recall anyone ever doing so.
 
Unlike a colleague who has a 12 hour short haul shift, including a 4 hour wait in Melbourne. What do you do in an airport terminal for 4 hours on Xmas day?!?!
How does the time at the airport affect his hours? Or does it?

As for twiddling his thumbs, iPad, Kindle ebook reader, etc...

Can he (or you) sneak into your airline's fancy dancy lounge and get a few zeds in?
 
Does this mean that you don't fly for most of December? That'd be handy.

There are a number of "available" days in there, where, in theory at least, a duty could be assigned. But, I'm currently running very close to all of the hours limits, so, in practice, any new duty would mean something else would have to be removed.

But, are you on call?

Not as in standby, as that is a specifically assigned duty, for which you're paid. There is a requirement to be contactable, at some specified times, so that a duty could be assigned or offered, but, as I said above, my real availability is currently very limited. CASA limits maximum hours over various periods, and as this past year has been my busiest ever, I'm bouncing off those limits.
 
How does the time at the airport affect his hours? Or does it?

A duty is limited in terms of duty time, flight deck duty time, and actual flight time. Time hanging around the airport counts as duty time. Depending upon your contract, you may not be paid for it, but, it counts as far as your day at work is concerned (i.e. the CASA limits).

Can he (or you) sneak into your airline's fancy dancy lounge and get a few zeds in?

Access to the lounges is very strictly limited, and you would not be able to go there. There are some crew lounges, of varying quality, at the airports.
 
JB, Boris et al,
I (and I'm sure others) would be interested in your thoughts on this one.
Crash: Indonesia Asia A320 over Java Sea on Dec 28th 2014, aircraft lost height and impacted waters, loss of rudder travel limiter due to maintenance

Maintenance issues aside (deeply troubling as they appear to be), how did the crew manage to lose the aircraft? Not responding to a rapid roll rate for 9 seconds seems like a long, long time - despite all the distractions.

And this bit..."The FDR recorded at 2317:15 UTC the aircraft pitch reached 24° up. The PIC commanded "pull down...pull down" and at 2317:17 UTC the FDR recorded second Stall Warning. Following the command "pull down...pull down" the FDR recorded the SIC side stick backward input increased."

Where to start...
 
Last edited:
JB, Boris et al,
I (and I'm sure others) would be interested in your thoughts on this one.
Crash: Indonesia Asia A320 over Java Sea on Dec 28th 2014, aircraft lost height and impacted waters, loss of rudder travel limiter due to maintenance

Maintenance issues aside (deeply troubling as they appear to be), how did the crew manage to lose the aircraft? Not responding to a rapid roll rate for 9 seconds seems like a long, long time - despite all the distractions.

And this bit..."The FDR recorded at 2317:15 UTC the aircraft pitch reached 24° up. The PIC commanded "pull down...pull down" and at 2317:17 UTC the FDR recorded second Stall Warning. Following the command "pull down...pull down" the FDR recorded the SIC side stick backward input increased."

Where to start...

9 seconds is an eternity.

The rudder travel limit failure would seem to be nothing more than a nuisance. It had no direct effect on the flight.

The crew (or at least the FO) obviously did not have enough ability to be able to fly the aircraft straight and level in alternate law. And he then seems to have held aft stick (which takes quite a bit of force) all the way to the water, and in so doing stopped the captain from being able to recover the aircraft. He was not a pilot...and sadly represents what many of us are afraid of with regard to the sort of training that you have been doing. I'm sure you'll hear much more discussion about the virtues of people with only a couple of hundred hours being placed in the right hand seat of airliners, where they will then operate only via the automatics.

The Airbus is not difficult to fly in alternate or direct law, but it is likely to be somewhat out of trim when the change happens. Not an excuse to lose control, but apparently all that was needed.

I guess English wasn't either's native language, but it shouldn't have mattered. You push to get out of a stall (unless you're brilliant enough to have managed an inverted one....). Exactly the same as AF447.
 
In both these cases why doesn't the more experienced pilot take control, instead of directing the FO?

If you read through the report the captain tried to take control (and the other FO also tried on AF447). In both cases the bloke in the right hand seat held aft stick all the way to the water. That's the drawback to the disconnected controls. You have no idea of what input is being made by the other person. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the FO in this case didn't even realise he was holding the input...the joystick had simply become something to hang on to. In the case of AF the bloke putting in the dud inputs actually pressed the override switch and took it back from the bloke doing the right thing. When the controls are solidly locked together, you can't input opposite controls, but here, all that happens is that the aircraft computers average the inputs, so full aft and full forward equal nothing.

You can lock the other joystick out, but you have to hold the override switch for 40 seconds, and then the other joystick will reactivate if its override is pressed, even momentarily.
 
JB in each case it appears that there was no clear instruction "I have control" from the more senior pilot when attempting to correct. Surely this would (or should) have triggered the more junior pilot to take their hand off the stick and act as pilot monitoring? Given the disconnected controls it seems it's all the more important for the clear delineation of roles?
 
JB in each case it appears that there was no clear instruction "I have control" from the more senior pilot when attempting to correct. Surely this would (or should) have triggered the more junior pilot to take their hand off the stick and act as pilot monitoring? Given the disconnected controls it seems it's all the more important for the clear delineation of roles?

You're quite right. But, when things turn to pooh, words are the first things forgotten.
 
Hi Pilots,
I have noticed on a number of domestic flights recently some red streamers placed over the Pitot tubes on 738's. Presumably these are put there (and taken off again before push back) by the ground crew as a visual warning to avoid damage?

Apologies for the poor photography, but it's the best my phone could do at distance.

image.jpg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    106.3 KB · Views: 454
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Stops bugs from crawling in and blocking the pitot tube. It's been notamed as a hazard at Brisbane for a little while (or at least was... Haven't been there for a while) so some airlines have mandated installing them on longer turn around. They would generally be on overnight it when the plane is parked for an extended period (but not on a 30 min turn at the gate)
 
I have noticed on a number of domestic flights recently some red streamers placed over the Pitot tubes on 738's. Presumably these are put there (and taken off again before push back) by the ground crew as a visual warning to avoid damage?

As explained by N860CR, the covers are to keep insects out of the probes. Normally they're put on overnight, but can be used any time there's a problem with insects. They certainly wouldn't work as warnings to ground crew....if anything, they'd home in on them. I'd have to admit that their proximity to aerobridges is pretty horrifying.

So, exactly are these probes that you're looking at? On the 737 pic, you can see 3 items on the right side, and 2 on the left. One on each side measures angle of attack, whilst the others are for the air data systems. These are called pitot probes, and are forward facing, and project out into the airflow. To measure airspeed, a second probe system is needed (generally close to the rear of the aircraft) called a static port - these don't project into the airflow. Basically, your airspeed is measured by the difference between the pitot pressure and the static pressure. Altitude is measured by the difference between the static pressure and a known datum pressure.

So, what happens if we block any of the probes?

The pitot probe has both an inlet and outlet (drain). If both parts are blocked (perhaps by icing), then the pressure inside the probe will remain constant. If you climb it will show an airspeed increase (because the actual pressure as measured by the static port is reducing), and it will show a decrease if you descend. If you remain at the same level, it will show a constant airspeed even if you change the actual speed. If only the inlet side is blocked, the pressure will drop to the static pressure, and the indicated airspeed will fall, eventually falling to zero.

If the static port is blocked, then it will hold the last pressure it had. Altitude indications will not change with an actual climb or descent. Airspeed will over-read during descent, and under-read during a climb.

If a mud wasp blocks the pitot during your time on the ground, then during the take off roll the airspeed will not increase (if totally blocked)....so cause for an abort.

Causes...icing, even though all of these probes have deicing systems (i.e. heating). Volcanic ash. Insects. Bird strike damage. Covers being left in place.

Aircraft can be successfully flown with any of these issues....they should almost be a non event, especially the icing ones, which will often cure themselves. Angle of attack data can actually be used instead of airspeed, although it isn't directly displayed in most aircraft. But, even though the aircraft should be quite flyable, blockages within the pitot/static systems have been implicated in many accidents, across all brands.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top