Ask The Pilot

  • Thread starter Thread starter NM
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
Those would look great as large format digital prints (if the resolution is high enough).
Shot with a Nikon D800, so the resolution is about 36 megapixels.

What did you use for those shots and settings, if available?
I’m learning about night photography but stuffing it up badly.

There are some good night photography groups on Facebook.

Nikkor 14-24 F2.8 lens, at 14mm.
ISO 2000
F2.8
30 seconds.

The shot needed to be long enough to catch a lightning flash....
 
Last edited:
Thanks, JB.

I’m with Gippsland Photographers. Lot of them specialise in Aurora chasing and other night photography. Problem is when they are organising shoots is when I’m usually working.
 
Shot with a Nikon D800, so the resolution is about 36 megapixels.

Nikkor 14-24 F2.8 lens, at 14mm.
You've had the D800 for a while now. I take it that you're happy with it?

The 14-24 lens, is it this one?

AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm F2.8G ED from Nikon

I ask as punching that into the google machine brings up a few different ones.

Still way out of my league. I have a D3300. I have a Tamron 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 wide angle which I got for my birthday. Just wondering how that'd go doing something like your shot above (not on a flight deck, but a nighttime one with some bright lights). Maybe I'll see how the A320 sim goes in a night flight sim.
 
You've had the D800 for a while now. I take it that you're happy with it?

The D800 must be approaching it's 6th birthday. Tremendous camera. My wife has a D850...but I'm not allowed to play with that. Any of that range (800/810/850) would do for almost any job. Most noticeable difference with the 850 is the much faster frame rate. Much as I'd like an 850, the 800 would have to die before it would be worthwhile.


Yes. I've actually got the magic set from Nikon. The 14-24, 24-70, and 70-200. I tried a cheaper wide angle, but it was obviously soft, so I returned it. The 800 has such a high resolution that it really shows up any faults with the lens.
 
The D800 must be approaching it's 6th birthday. Tremendous camera. My wife has a D850...but I'm not allowed to play with that.
At around $5k I would imagine that she's rather protective of it.
I'm tossing up whether to go Nikon, say the 850, or to get a Canon 5D which is a comparable camera. Greater range of better lenses with the FX/EF types.

In the meantime I'll continue to learn how to drive the D3300...
 
At around $5k I would imagine that she's rather protective of it.
I'm tossing up whether to go Nikon, say the 850, or to get a Canon 5D which is a comparable camera. Greater range of better lenses with the FX/EF types.

In the meantime I'll continue to learn how to drive the D3300...

The reality is that a good photographer will take a better picture with a brick, than will a bad one with the best camera on the planet. You need to be pretty serious before there's any real benefit with the 800 series or their equivalents. And, glass is still much more important than the body.
 
The reality is that a good photographer will take a better picture with a brick, than will a bad one with the best camera on the planet. You need to be pretty serious before there's any real benefit with the 800 series or their equivalents. And, glass is still much more important than the body.
Last year up at East Sale I met up with a few of the folks from the photographer group to watch the E18/G Growlers do their thing.

Whilst nothing was happening for a couple of hours (my wife called and asked what was going on, haven't those jets growled yet), we chatted about this sort of thing.

They had 800 series and 5D classes of cameras and lenses which were uber-expensive. But they were types who could take photos with bricks. They had invested a hell of a lot of time in their art as well as tens of thousands of dollars on equipment. But they said to me to "spend more on glass". Their exact words. I hadn't heard lenses refered to as "glass" before then.

I took all the gear to Alaska with me in August. Got some nice shots of glaciers, bears in the woods (no, not doing that) and so on. Still so-so photography, I thought, despite me filling one SD card with 20 million shots of Tracy Fjord...
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Time to get back onto the 'Asking the Pilot' folks. :mad:

If you wish to talk further photography then start a thread and a mod will move your photographic discussion there.

Thanks. :D
 
Time to get back onto the 'Asking the Pilot' folks. :mad:

If you wish to talk further photography then start a thread and a mod will move your photographic discussion there.

Thanks. :D

OK I'll bite.

@ jb747 and I ask with all due respect to both you and RdC. Wondering if you have ever been in an A380 SIM and entered all the conditions of QF32 and had a go at the landing?

What outcome did you have?

What would you have done differently to RdC?
 
Last edited:
@ jb747 and I ask with all due respect to both you and RdC. Wondering if you have ever been in an A380 SIM and entered all the conditions of QF32 and had a go at the landing?

I was in the sim only a few days after the event. At that stage they had a listing of all of the ECAMs, and whilst it wasn't possible to replicate it exactly, the system took most of the faults. Both the senior check and I had a go at it.

What outcome did you have?

Two landings within the confines of the runway.

The sim did not replicate the brake issues properly, so we had better braking available than actually existed.

What would you have done differently to RdC?

I'm not going to double guess him. What he did worked on the day.
 
Hi JB My understanding was thar RdC was the pilot flying for QF 32 and I think you said for QF 30 that the first officer flew the plane. Was it they just had that role at the time of the incident or was there other reasons for the different approach?
 
Hi JB My understanding was thar RdC was the pilot flying for QF 32 and I think you said for QF 30 that the first officer flew the plane. Was it they just had that role at the time of the incident or was there other reasons for the different approach?

In both cases, the PF for the sector was the pilot who did the initial flying. In RdC's case, he remained PF for the entire sector. He had a particularly good FO, so letting him run the ECAMs made sense. The autopilot also remained available, so the actual flying should not have taken too much attention. The idea here is that it should leave some brain space for the Captain to oversee what is happening, and to plan the outcome.

QF30 was somewhat different. The initial fault was an autopilot disconnect, so as pilot flying, Bernie grabbed the aircraft, and just kept it where it was. I went looking for the actual problem, and found it a few seconds later. From that point I treated Bernie like a voice operated autopilot. He was doing a perfectly good job of doing the flying I wanted to happen, and it let me get on with sorting out our issues. So, basically the FO unloaded the flying job from me, thereby giving me the space to work on the problems. Once we'd levelled off, and got into the tidying up stage, I took over the flying (until touchdown), and Bernie went back over what we'd done.

Basically, my plan in any emergency is to leave the pilot flying as is, until we have the initial part of the event sorted out. I will do the landing in all cases, but if the FO is flying....as long as he's got it in hand, I'll leave him to it.
 
JB, I was revisiting the comments of ‘that landing’ in Düsseldorf and a 744 driver commented that the jumbo’s autopilot doesn’t keep up very well in gusty winds. Did you find that to be the case and if so is it SOP to fly windy approaches with the AT disconnected?
 
JB, I was revisiting the comments of ‘that landing’ in Düsseldorf and a 744 driver commented that the jumbo’s autopilot doesn’t keep up very well in gusty winds. Did you find that to be the case and if so is it SOP to fly windy approaches with the AT disconnected?

Dusseldorf has a number of landings that could fit that comment. Which one do you mean? The EK 380? That landing is just mishandled.... From what I've heard it was done by a trainee, and there was an element of dual control input involved.

Gusty crosswind landings are mostly done manually. The 380 autopilot does a much better job of handling them than does the 747, but it's still better to do it yourself.

You've typed "AT disconnected".... Do you mean the throttle or was that a typo? The 747 auto throttle won't handle it at all, and as a general rule (in the 747), you disconnect the autothrottle as you disconnect the autopilot. The 380, on the other hand, has a full range AT that is meant to be left engaged whether you are flying manually, or using the autopilot. In gusty conditions you can do it yourself, but it does a better job than most of us. The only time I haven't used the 380 auto thrust to touchdown has been when a failure has stopped me from doing so.
 
Last edited:
You've typed "AT disconnected".... Do you mean the throttle or was that a typo? The 747 auto throttle won't handle it at all, and as a general rule (in the 747), you disconnect the autothrottle as you disconnect the autopilot

Yes sorry I meant autothrottle and you were correct about the landing I was referring to. The comments about the 744 throttle were that he preferred to allow fluctuation around the speed bugs. This is probably all standard stuff for those who fly the 747 but I found it an interesting tidbit.

Interesting about the 380 AT as I noticed on your video of the manual landing in MEL you switched to speed select before you made the final turn and then switched back to managed for the landing.
 
Interesting about the 380 AT as I noticed on your video of the manual landing in MEL you switched to speed select before you made the final turn and then switched back to managed for the landing.

At about 14 miles to run, or earlier if we choose it, the aircraft speed control switches to 'approach phase'. You'll probably hear it on Airbus recordings as a comment at around that distance. It's a selection on the FMC performance page. It changes the targeted airspeed to green dot...which means that as you take more flap, the speed target reduces. Approaching the turn to finals in Melbourne, we've probably just selected flap 2. Green dot for that is probably about 165 knots. But, ATC want us to maintain 185....to go get that we go back to selected and control the deceleration. Most of the time, we go back to managed once full flap is selected, or by about 5 miles.
 
JB and others.

In today's paper:

Category: | Herald Sun

What would you guys like to see here?

In the comments they are varied. From a 2nd airport to "arguments" about immigration, none of them make any sense to me.
 
Paywall....
Dagnabbit!

More than a fifth of flights at Melbourne Airport are running late as surging passenger numbers create delays on Tullamarine’s two crowded runways.

New figures show the number of trips running on time at the city’s major airport is now below 80 per cent and falling, with airport officials arguing the data shows plans for a third runway are vital.

Flights between Melbourne and Sydney, one of the world’s busiest routes, have also recorded spikes in cancellations and late planes.


In the 12 months to November last year, there were 2969 cancelled flights between the two cities and the number of monthly cancellations has doubled in the space of a year.

Bargain airlines Jetstar and Tigerair recorded some of the airport’s lowest on-time performances, according to the latest figures, while QantasLink passengers had the highest chance of departing and arriving on schedule.


Melbourne Airport CEO Lyell Strambi said extreme weather had a major impact on flights in November but said there was a real decline in overall on-time performance.

“In November we saw extreme weather restrict capacity between Melbourne and Sydney, the world’s second busiest air route,” he said.

“Notwithstanding those seasonal weather impacts, Melbourne Airport’s on-time performance is below 80 per cent and gradually falling, due to capacity constraints on our two-runway system.

“This is why a third runway is vital, to keep up with Victoria’s growing demand for air travel while preserving a quality traveller experience.”

In November last year, 4494 planes did not arrive or depart on time.
Mr Strambi said the airport was expected to receive nearly 70 million passengers by 2038.

“Meeting that demand requires us to address congestion in the terminals, on our roads and in the air.

“That is why over the next decade we need to invest, on average, more than half a billion dollars per year, every year, to improve, maintain and grow the asset.”

An Australian Airports Association spokeswoman said operating restrictions at Sydney airport made it difficult for airlines to recover from severe weather events.

“Over the long term, increasing capacity will ensure airports can continue to recover quickly from weather events and disruptions,” she said.

“Melbourne Airport’s new runway will not only give Victorian passengers more choice, but will further support the efficiency of the national aviation network.

“This will not only facilitate continued passenger growth in the state, but will also provide additional flexibility when disruptions occur.”
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top