This is an interesting topic and I'm surprised it hasn't evolved (devolved?) into a more detailed analysis of the relationship between the various parties.
The ATO is basic. They charge a fee because they get charged a fee. From then on it gets interesting. I pay a $10k tax bill with Amex. Tax office hits me (say) $150. I gain 10,000 points which I use to upgrade a forthcoming economy flight to business. In this scenario no-one loses. The ATO covered their costs. The airline only upgraded me because there was no paying bum in that seat and I've paid $150 for the upgrade.
There are other sides to the coin where the airlines lose out. They are obviously aware of this, as are the banks. Hence the push back.
What is the ideal balance? Any takers?
The ATO is basic. They charge a fee because they get charged a fee. From then on it gets interesting. I pay a $10k tax bill with Amex. Tax office hits me (say) $150. I gain 10,000 points which I use to upgrade a forthcoming economy flight to business. In this scenario no-one loses. The ATO covered their costs. The airline only upgraded me because there was no paying bum in that seat and I've paid $150 for the upgrade.
There are other sides to the coin where the airlines lose out. They are obviously aware of this, as are the banks. Hence the push back.
What is the ideal balance? Any takers?