But who was taking care of the health aspects of the quarantine hotels?This is a massive oversight on the part of the Victorian Government.Especially as other States went with the police / ADF personnel in providing the quarantine hotel security.
Quite frankly one heck of a lot worse than the NSW Ruby Princess fiasco.
Yes I agree on the lack of appropriate public health oversight, and in earlier posts it was one of points I listed. In terms of Ruby Princess, total cases and economic damage will most likely be far worse. In terms of deaths the genomic sequencing should make the final death toll known. Currently probably zero, but I doubt it will remain so. The eventual genomic sequencing reports will reveal the total number of cases and deaths generated from this failure.
With respect to the health aspects no one has stated what happened, and who was doing what. Obviously health monitoring and testing of the quarantined was occurring, but there seems to have been zero public references as to who was doing it, and indeed who was doing what. There also seems to have been zero feedback from whomever was doing it with respect to what they may have as in breaches observed in terms of the poor practices of the security guards. Independent health monitory of the guards seems to have been non existent.
Who was monitoring the health aspects? Was anyone monitoring the hotel quarantine health aspects as an overall project, or was some just arranging the subset of nurses performing health checks and tests on the quarantines? One can guess that both politicians and public servants dropped the ball here.
The security staff too are at fault for while they were being exploited they should also have known better what to do to at least a certain level based just on what was public knowledge. Though yes proper training is required to achieve good PPE practices as but one example.
With respect to the security contracts, yes whomever (and it most likely a number of people) in the government/bureaucracy did not follow through with ensuring that appropriate services and value was being delivered and they are at best incompetent. Whether it was the same people who were also meant to arranging the health aspects is I believe unknown.
There was a need for speed and so the contract was rushed. So not not surprising that you would get problems. This was to be expected. The truly surprising aspect seems to be that no-one was checking for continual improvement. That initial contract/s should have been just the starting point. There should have been ongoing review and monitoring and indeed renegotiation of the contracts where required. None of this would appear to have occurred.
The enquiry when it is eventually completed will reveal much.