Which leads to a potential future scenario of Victoria through its hard shut down getting the virus down a point where some states will reopen to them, and NSW may still be left out in the cold, as they are content to let it bubble along at current levels.
Weird world.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
yes me too! Including to see family interstate.That is true but this little black duck would like to go somewhere else.
NSW Premier and various Ministers have repeatedly said that they are not pursuing an elimination strategy, that they are happy with some underlying degree of virus in the community
I thought it was quite telling this morning that the Qld presser gave forewarning to border residents to think about how they will operate in the event of a closed border shutting off access for even them.
But travellers from overseas haven’t caused the current issues. I suspect it has been bubbling away in the western parts from very early on.Well that is aligned with the federal stance - ScoMo has never stated elimination is the goal.
NSW has taken over 60% of all international arrivals since the hotel quarantine program began, so unless we stop all international arrivals permanently we will never get to zero. Where fallible people are involved, there is always some risk of a traveller infecting someone at the airport or en route to isolation or a self entitled Richard Cranium doing the wrong thing like setting off the fire alarms to escape briefly or transmission when treating in hospital, So if NSW get to zero community transmission for a month (2 infection periods) will borders be slammed shut again if there is 1 infection due to a breach ?
One would think there is a low tolerable number that if they can test, track/trace and ring-fence is acceptable, given we will be living with this for years (if not forever). Even with the worlds best vaccine, zero cases indefinitely is unlikely. we have very high levels of vaccination for measles, yet there are still cases every year.
Where fallible people are involved, there is always some risk of a traveller infecting someone at the airport or en route to isolation or a self entitled Richard Cranium doing the wrong thing like setting off the fire alarms to escape briefly or transmission when treating in hospital, S
But travellers from overseas haven’t caused the current issues. I suspect it has been bubbling away in the western parts from very early on.
Winter is nearly done - I must admit at the weekend I was thinking longingly of Port Douglas, but once it gets to Spring it lovely here. No Floriade this year thoughThat is true but this little black duck would like to go somewhere else.
Well of course that’s a given and the same all around the world except China. But my point is that NSW manages the process well so can’t the reason for the current bubbling.Actually that isn't true. All active cases in NSW have been linked to the Vic Quarantine breaches by genomic testing - so yes the source was ultimately international.
Yes and some, one, senior federal minister from Victoria has been lambasting state premier and state government demanding accountability. Where’s the mia culpa and accountability from the feds for the aged care deaths?This is just another example of the 'lack of response' despite all the spin put out - evidence given today at the Aged Care Royal Commission. Among other sad points of note - Australia has one of the highest CV death rates in Aged Care facilities whilst having one of the lowest death rates overall.
NO COVID-19 PLAN FOR AGED CARE
Mr Rozen told the commission there was no national co-ordinated plan for how to deal with COVID-19 in aged care from either the federal government – who is responsible for aged care – or from the industry.
“How well prepared is the Australian aged care sector for 2019?” he asked.
“On July 29 2020, as COVID-19 was raging through a large number of nursing homes in Melbourne with devastating consequences, commonwealth Health Minister Greg Hunt was quoted as saying that, and I quote, ‘aged care around the country has been immensely prepared’.
“In a number of important respects, the evidence will demonstrate that the sector has been underprepared.
“While there was undoubtedly a great deal done to prepare the Australian health sector more generally for the pandemic, the evidence will reveal that neither the commonwealth Department of Health nor the aged care regulator developed a COVID-19 plan specifically for the aged care sector.”
He said a regulator was set up in July last year to keep the sector in line – but its preparation, after the coronavirus was first identified in Australia in March, largely consisted of sending out a survey that providers filled out themselves.
And 99.5 per cent of providers assessed their readiness for the coronavirus as satisfactory, with 42.7 rating themselves as “best practice” – including Newmarch House, where 17 residents died from an outbreak.
------------------------------------
Mentioned later the NSW Dept of Health at the outset specifically requested that no residents from Newmarch House be admitted to hospital as 'it may set a precedent'. At best an unethical request and possibly borderline illegal to request it seems.
Yes and some, one, senior federal minister from Victoria has been lambasting state premier and state government demanding accountability. Where’s the mia culpa and accountability from the feds for the aged care deaths?
yes but, it’s the feds who have responsibilities that they have consistently underfunded and under monitored.I agree, but of course the actual care in the facilities has been as a result of interaction between the feds and state authorities.
From today's Royal Commission, via the ABC and the Oz:
Counsel assisting the commission Peter Rozen QC outlined arguments between commonwealth and state officials over how to handle residents who had contracted coronavirus, and a “hospital in the home” policy imposed on Newmarch residents.
“There was a vigorous disagreement between the Commonwealth and NSW officials on this question of hospitalisation of COVID-19 positive residents in the early days of the outbreak at Newmarch House,” Mr Rozen said.
“The following words (in the email) appear next to the words ‘NSW Health’: ‘Preference is not to decant residents into hospitals given the precedent this would set. Need to find solutions that enable appropriate care to be provided in the facility. Looking at Hospital in the Home and ‘in-reach’ palliative care if needed.” Mr Rozen said.
Mr Rozen then cited an email from aged care quality and safety commissioner Janet Anderson on the same day, after the meeting, raising serious concerns about the NSW Health department’s position.
Ms Anderson’s email said in part “if there is a view sitting behind the NSW Health position that aged care residents with COVID-19 should always be cared for in situ and should not be transferred to a hospital in any circumstances, then WE MUST CALL THIS OUT as an intolerable and unsupportable assumption.”
The situation in Victoria is not being looked at for now, so as not to divert resources.
Well of course that’s a given and the same all around the world except China. But my point is that NSW manages the process well so can’t the reason for the current bubbling.