Ah, so there is the rub. Your self-interest.
Quite a leap of your imagination there! I am not in 1A or 1B nor over 50 so diverting AZ doses to PNG doesnt impact me personally at all. But I have family and friends who are in 1A and 1B and dont want them or other in that category delayed. It makes sense to delay 1B for 1A, but not to delay either for anyone else.
I am concerned about my ICU nurse friend who is treating one of the 2 hospitalised covid-19 patients in NSW as we speak but cant get her second Pfizer shot until September, that has nothing to do with me. I am annoyed that those not working with Covid positives have received vaccines before those that do (again nothing to do with me personally).
More made up and quite hysterical rubbish by yourself.
Jake suggested we give more a heap more doses to PNG, I didnt make this up. I simply stated under what circumstances I am against that idea. Why is it ok for one member to say what they would like to see happen ( a hypothetiucal), but not for me to disagree with that hypothetical and say why? I never posted that the Govt were planning to give Pfizer away just that I am against them doing so.
Again you go looking to pick fights and invent a motive or things that were never said. Im neither hysterical nor making up things, just stating my position. It is possible to have a position on something that has yet to happen. However, you are incapable of recognising that just because a situation isnt the topic of a newpaper artcile it can still be discussed. I can make up my own mind on what I would like to see happen or not happen.
Do I support ability to order vaccines privately should they become legitimately available (not stolen from govenrment orders)? Of course I do (and many others would also happily pay a premium to receive their vaccination of choice).
Do I support vaccine choice under govenrment when supply allows it? Yes I do, especially as choice will lead to higher uptake.
I have never suggested anyone should jump the freebie government queue - in fact Ive argued that 1A under 50s should be guranteed their Pfizer ahead of anyone in 1B. However, when feasible there should also be private paid options like there is for other vaccinations such as HPV. Private options take pressure of govenrment programs, and again choice gives control which promotes greater consumer confidence.