Australians stuck in Tokyo Narita Airside after JQ delays flight 24h

Status
Not open for further replies.
From reading the various sources… seems pax were in the transit area. No way to leave, no emergency visas. Due to covid most of the restaurants and food outlets appear to be closed.

Could JQ reps have hopped to the local 7/11 to make up and provide 24 snack bags? You’d like to have thought so, but maybe no time to do that and get it to the pax, especially as I imagine security would have closed at 11pm once the airport did?

As for EU261 I don’t believe that will apply. The flight out of the EU on finnair was on time. It was the connecting flight that was delayed. Had the finnair flight been late, resulting in the missed connection, that might have triggered 261. But as we have seen from another thread, AY seems keen to avoid its obligations.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Could JQ reps have hopped to the local 7/11 to make up and provide 24 snack bags?
Maybe, but we don’t know at the moment.

Would these be staff who would usually arrive in Jetstar regalia a few hours prior to departure?
 
From reading the various sources… seems pax were in the transit area. No way to leave, no emergency visas. Due to covid most of the restaurants and food outlets appear to be closed.

Could JQ reps have hopped to the local 7/11 to make up and provide 24 snack bags? You’d like to have thought so, but maybe no time to do that and get it to the pax, especially as I imagine security would have closed at 11pm once the airport did?

As for EU261 I don’t believe that will apply. The flight out of the EU on finnair was on time. It was the connecting flight that was delayed. Had the finnair flight been late, resulting in the missed connection, that might have triggered 261. But as we have seen from another thread, AY seems keen to avoid its obligations.


EU261 applies as long as the itinerary is booked on the same ticket, and booked with an EU carrier. It's JQ that's on the hook though, not AY.
 
Heads should roll for this disaster. Absolute disregard for the Jetstar passengers. Do they plan 10 minutes ahead? If they do they should be dismissed. If they say they plan ahead then their abysmal performance means that they should be dismissed.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: DC3


EU261 applies as long as the itinerary is booked on the same ticket, and booked with an EU carrier. It's JQ that's on the hook though, not AY.
I’m not sure. I’ve read through that case and the commentary, it looks like United was flying the entire itinerary as a code-share partner for Lufthansa. This included the flight ex EU and later the connection within the USA. Para 31

In the current case, it would certainly be applicable if passengers were being carried on an AY flight number on the JQ flight. But I don’t know if it would apply if on a JQ flight number?

There’s some commentary on the case here: EU261 Rules Are Now Applicable To Non-EU Carriers Operating For EU Airlines which summarises the facts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top