VAG newbie
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2013
- Posts
- 839
re: Avianca "Life Miles" - Questions and Discussion
To me, it's not the ethnicity that matters, but how the pilots were trained and what kind of company culture an airline had that matters.
Take an example, both China Airlines and EVA are from Taiwan, so same ethnicity. EVA is regarded as one of the safest airlines in the world whereas China Airlines is one of the worst. The difference lies with that China Airlines, being a state owned airline, used to recruit ex-Air Force pilots, and the military culture heavily affected CRM in China Airlines which accounted for a lot of accidents in the late 90's. EVA on the other hand, being privately owned, they train their pilots from the beginning. But I know China airlines has worked hard on its safety and has not had anymore fatal accident since 2002.
I know Air China is not China airlines. But I wasn't sure how they recruit and train their pilot, but it is certainly reassuring to know that they recruit Aussie/Kiwi pilots. After all, we train the best pilots in the world and many major airlines recruit our pilots.
And yes, I know the chances of us die in a car crash on the way to the airport is higher than die in a plane crash, I would still steer away from bad airlines. Fortunately, Air China isn't one of them. I did some more research after today, and I was surprised to discover that according to JACDEC data published in 2014, Air China's ranking is higher than US airways, JAL, Alaska, Asiana and SAS in terms of safety!
yes ok - you picked an oldie and a goodie! I agree it's an extreme example of not understanding something, but that can happen. It's a two way street between the pilot and ATC to make sure instructions are clear, and understood, and they got there in the end. My friend in ATC says (less extreme) examples happen on a daily basis ... not restricted to any one airline, or airlines from particular countries.
From my discussions I'm not sure if there was any real danger.
To me, it's not the ethnicity that matters, but how the pilots were trained and what kind of company culture an airline had that matters.
Take an example, both China Airlines and EVA are from Taiwan, so same ethnicity. EVA is regarded as one of the safest airlines in the world whereas China Airlines is one of the worst. The difference lies with that China Airlines, being a state owned airline, used to recruit ex-Air Force pilots, and the military culture heavily affected CRM in China Airlines which accounted for a lot of accidents in the late 90's. EVA on the other hand, being privately owned, they train their pilots from the beginning. But I know China airlines has worked hard on its safety and has not had anymore fatal accident since 2002.
I know Air China is not China airlines. But I wasn't sure how they recruit and train their pilot, but it is certainly reassuring to know that they recruit Aussie/Kiwi pilots. After all, we train the best pilots in the world and many major airlines recruit our pilots.
And yes, I know the chances of us die in a car crash on the way to the airport is higher than die in a plane crash, I would still steer away from bad airlines. Fortunately, Air China isn't one of them. I did some more research after today, and I was surprised to discover that according to JACDEC data published in 2014, Air China's ranking is higher than US airways, JAL, Alaska, Asiana and SAS in terms of safety!