IIRC QF has been able to confirm DOH-JRO, and the DXB-DOH sector shouldn't be that hard to confirm. QF can also release inventory into award space. Putting those together is an immediate solution. Of course it is the OP's choice as to whether they want to take that or potentially end up with something even less ideal in terms of dates or routing.
You're no doubt right, but the fact still remains that this is a problem of QF's creation, not of the customer. Why should the customer,then, settle for something to which he did not sign up for when he booked the ticket, and received a confirmed(so he felt) booking and paid the appropriate price for it (in this case, points). To me, he agreed to a contact with QF (these things are supposed to work both ways
) when he booked and paid, and through no fault of his own, and no change on QR's part (ie: schedule) he has, currently, lost what he ordered. Sure he could cancel his booking and do something else, but I still contend that the OP shouldn't HAVE to change what he booked because QF screwed it up.
I suppose, strictly speaking, one could argue that the booking was for transportation between SYD and JRO and specifics of the transportation are not guaranteed, and if QF decides to put him on SYD-DXB-JRO or SYD-ADL-DOH-JRO they should be able to, but one also has to consider the original schedule that the OP ordered when he booked (so going round-about may not work) and also a factor has to be that the OP clearly wanted to try QR 380 in J. I can see both sodes of if QF is obligated to provide him with travel on QR in J on the 380 SYD-DOH-JRO or not - that gets a bit murky - but the spirit of the transaction should be honoured IMHO.
It's one thing if you have flights booked and the airline makes an a/c or product sub for operational reasons. You have to suck it up or find an alternative on the day. This is not that situation. QF admits they screwed up, but they seem to be not exactly going out of their way to make this right (again, this is not about the actions of individual CSRs here, but the process).
I just find it a very poor customer service situation by QF as reported (and to be fair, we only have one side of this to go on but I have no reason to doubt the OP).
Sure, QR can be difficult to deal with I believe (I have a good mate who worked at a senior level for them and Al Baker and has some stories
) but at the end of the day this is not really about QR and their policies, this is about a failure at QF. They need to own this. It almost seems like they hope it will resolve by either the OP accepting an alternate that may not suit, or hoping multiple SSR's to QR will get the inventory back and it will all go away.
I keep thinking of this situation as reported and my own role in my job where part of it involves supporting customers of one sort or another. Frankly if I caused a screw up in a system or something, or was requied to respond to or resolve one that I was responsible for, it's for me to liase with the affected client and customer and let them know what is going on, expected time frame - and to keep them updated as things progress (and yes, I've even sent people messages to say basically "we're still working on this issue, we have no ETA yet but we're working on it" - far from perfect, but at least the customer hopefully understands through that that that I, as representative of my employer, or the guy working on it, gives a cough and is being responsible enough to keep them in the loop. No way would I say "hey you drop me a line in a few days and I'll let you know" - that seems like horrendous customer service to me.
I don't want to harp on at QF about this, but the reality is that this is part of a bigger flaw that so MANY PNRs wind up in the manual far queue and this is an extreme example of the effects of this. QF should be working to resolve the overall issue as much as they should be working to resolve this particular situation. I find it mind boggling that this continues to happen as has been a known issue for years now.
but given that it is, own it, and you manage it appropriately. As I posted before this is now a situation of service recovery, and QF is doing a poor effort - because even if QR are being difficult about the inventory and other options are difficult, I bet if there was person X assigned to see this issue through contacted the OP at regular intervals to update them, that would do far more to make them feel like a valued customer and that QF wants to resolve this issue than basically fobbing them off more or less "call back in a few days, or a few weeks" - really? I'd probably have managers belting me around the years if I said that to a customer!
I do feel a bit passionate about this I must admit