Reported on the news tonight that the ADF called it in also but got to ASA about 1hr later. Probably tried to call over DNATS…..Of course it's possible (maybe even probable) a part of the ADF did know beforehand, but not the part that speaks to Airservices, so the information flow is slow.
And also that they may never admit to knowing if their method of attaining that knowledge is classified.
bearded scallops
Haven't heard of that before, so I looked it up. Hmmmm. You don't mean the roe? I'd put scallop beard lovers in the same class as scallop roe-removers.
Informative
What a laughing stock our Defences are....That's an upgrade
![]()
Tasmania’s wooden police boat celebrates 50 years of service - Tasmania Police
Tomorrow Tasmania Police’s vessel ‘Vigilant’ marks 50 years of continuous operational service. Assistant Commissioner Adrian Bodnar said the Tasmanian-built PV Vigilant has made an outstanding contribution to both maritime law enforcement and safety since it was welcomed into the Tasmania Police...www.police.tas.gov.au
You mean the ADF? What Defence force?Defences
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
That’s a state thing - police boats…What a laughing stock our Defences are....
Actually, we have some pretty impressive hardware afloat (and under water).You mean the ADF? What Defence force?
McHale's Navy have sorted out the issue.
In such small numbers...Actually, we have some pretty impressive hardware afloat (and under water).
Size isn’t everything!In such small numbers...
Not at all. Should be concentrating on Australia, not wasting $300billion on silly submarines to support US policy in SCS.What a laughing stock our Defences are....
Not size, number...Size
Size of fleet…. All very capable!Not size, number...
That article is dribble. There’s f’all the ADF can do about Chinese ships sailing in international waters.![]()
Our defences have been tested, and they’ve failed
How much faith can we have that the Defence Force will know what’s going on and keep the public informed about any threats? Very little, if the past week is anything to go on.www.smh.com.au
No. The Anzacs have crewing issues and maintenance delays though AMCAP will keep them ticking over hopefully until more Hunters arrive. And 1 ANZAC already retired. COLLINS?. Maybe half are operational capable at any time.All very capable!
The fleet force structure has pretty much had that as the basis of operations for decades. At least 2 of 3 destroyers active. At least 2 of 6 submarines active and any frigate is a bonus. We actually only ordered 6 ANZACs but the Kiwis renigged and we ended up with eight.No. The Anzacs have crewing issues and maintenance delays though AMCAP will keep them ticking over hopefully until more Hunters arrive. And 1 ANZAC already retired. COLLINS?. Maybe half are operational capable at any time.
And only 3Hobarts which are the most advanced in the fleet
The ANZACS were supposed to be the second line surface combatant ships per the 1987 paper which called for an expanded Navy but it neverdid not expandThe fleet force structure has pretty much had that as the basis of operations for decades
The ANZACs started life as a Tier 3 Offshore Patrol Vessel (circa 2500 tonnes) but someone (who shall remain nameless) inserted a requirement to carry a seahawk helicopter. Thus ballooning the size to a min of 3500 tonne. That’s what spooked the Kiwis…The ANZACS were supposed to be the second line surface combatant ships per the 1987 paper which called for an expanded Navy but it neverdid not expand