- Joined
- Jun 3, 2010
- Posts
- 859
I think we need to make that mandatory….. if airline A can’t do it, then rebook on another that’s can.
Not only for cancellations - last Fri June 9 we missed a SQ flt SIN-MEL due to delayed dep SQ flt ex FRA - SQ put us on later SIN-SYD flt then QF flt SYD-MEL - totally makes total sense for airlines to cooperate in re-accommodating pax in such a manner - will always work both ways over a period of time^ Did airlines really book you on a rival airline, when flights were cancelled?
Adding to other examples, I had an AA flight from LAX-BOS in December 2021. I arrived on a seperate ticket from NAN on FJ, which was delayed, then had 2+ hours in LAX immigration so missed the AA flight completely.^ Did airlines really book you on a rival airline, when flights were cancelled?
11 years ago I had a CX flight which was canned, but the alternates were One World … VA can only really stick you on their competitor‘s flights if they run out of flights themselves.
They can, it depends on a few things, and the other airline needs to have an interline agreement in place. They'll still try to rebook on their own or partner flights before going to another unrelated airline.^ Did airlines really book you on a rival airline, when flights were cancelled?
11 years ago I had a CX flight which was canned, but the alternates were One World … VA can only really stick you on their competitor‘s flights if they run out of flights themselves.
Yes and I experienced this many times in the past in both economy and business class.^ Did airlines really book you on a rival airline, when flights were cancelled?
11 years ago I had a CX flight which was canned, but the alternates were One World … VA can only really stick you on their competitor‘s flights if they run out of flights themselves.
The best part of the EU/EK model is the duty of care. "Extraordinary Circumstances" has no relevance.We need the EU/UK model! Not that it’s really going to assist many people domestically given the high frequency, but it might for international.
EU UK has weather as an extraordinary reason. But unsure if ongoing actual aircraft delay is carried over. Suspect not. EU UK is small.Well let’s hope we don’t go anywhere near the Canadian model! Weather is carved out, as are safety related issues ‘at gate’ immediately prior to departure.
<snip>
We need the EU/UK model! Not that it’s really going to assist many people domestically given the high frequency, but it might for international.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Good to see. Would never happen in Australia due to Qantas passenger tax.I saw this in the philippines recently:
View attachment 375548
View attachment 375549
View attachment 375550
The kicker: There was a staffed "passenger rights action desk" next to this sign, where one could presumably seek support if they are not being supported by the airline.
Yes, but my understanding it has to be severe weather, not something which might be expected within the norms.EU UK has weather as an extraordinary reason. But unsure if ongoing actual aircraft delay is carried over. Suspect not. EU UK is small.
Australia and Canada some what similar being large countries with few major airports (4~5) and smaller regional airports, with limited services per day.
Given the time delay before UK-EU261 kicks in would be limited compensation.
But as above EU UK duty of care is a winner.
This is sensational - it's one thing to have these 'rights' in place, but having someone on site able to assist in one way or another would make all the difference.The kicker: There was a staffed "passenger rights action desk" next to this sign, where one could presumably seek support if they are not being supported by the airline.
Did this make it past the first reading?I believe this proposed bill is being debated today.
It's just legislating that Carrier Obligation rules be made...and it is not supported by the Government.
Long way to go yet.
I saw this in the philippines recently:
View attachment 375548
View attachment 375549
View attachment 375550
The kicker: There was a staffed "passenger rights action desk" next to this sign, where one could presumably seek support if they are not being supported by the airline.
2nd Reading debated, adjourned. Even if it passes the Upper House it won't pass the Lower.Did this make it past the first reading?