- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Posts
- 27,975
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Star Alliance
- Silver
re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April
Edit: Admin's post put up while this was being written.
Thanks serfty. As markis10 appears to have gone to ground on the issue, may I re-direct my queries to you? I appreciate your input as a moderator and you may have better things to do, but you'll observe there is some general interest here on these issues.
Straight up I haven't entertained the thought that any moderator / any one else who got the private briefing has used such to their advantage.
But I genuinely would like to know how extensive the briefing was amongst this community (who got the briefing) and would like to inquire as to why they thought it was useful to be in on it, if they weren't able to share the info with the forum. You will have read my suspicion - that QF was using the briefing to curry favour with the mods as being 'special' and to influence the course of the debate here in QF's favour. My own opinion FWIW is that they have only had limited success.
Many a time I have been offered privileged information (in business wrt corporate activity; in the share market; in local politics/council activity) but I've always said "don't tell me - if I can't use the info, I don't want to know it. It could only taint me afterwards."
I respect you and other mods for your knowledge and time put into the forum - but if mods are getting special treatment from QF, and its not openly declared and if there seems a pattern of favours given to mods (and/or others) by QF - then I think the status of mods as a class is diminished.
Any odour, however I put at QF's feet.
So please, lets have an open declaration as to who received the briefing. And, if they choose, an opinion, with the benefit of hind sight, as to whether it was a good idea to be on the hearing end, since the info was not able to be passed onto the forum members. Why did the recipients think they were being included?
Thanks.
There was an online briefing given at 4pm yesterday - I was part of it, and received the invitation after 2pm. Being a part of the briefing was conditional on agreeing to a 6am embargo on the information given.
I also made an ASA booking yesterday at approx 1:40PM - I posted about the booking on the FFA FB page. Now, I was already looking to make that booking; had identified the availability and the flights I wanted to book. The only reason I had not booked it was that I actually waiting for my charge card "end of month" to tick over for with the ~$660 co-pay. I saw 787800's post and decided to proceed in any case. I did not make the booking because I had non public information.
The cliff noted I posted this morning was a basic summary of that briefing:
Other things of note was that QFF were going to send emails about the changes to all members who had redeemed an award in the last year or so.
I do regret not asking about the non point to point fares.
Edit: Admin's post put up while this was being written.
Thanks serfty. As markis10 appears to have gone to ground on the issue, may I re-direct my queries to you? I appreciate your input as a moderator and you may have better things to do, but you'll observe there is some general interest here on these issues.
Straight up I haven't entertained the thought that any moderator / any one else who got the private briefing has used such to their advantage.
But I genuinely would like to know how extensive the briefing was amongst this community (who got the briefing) and would like to inquire as to why they thought it was useful to be in on it, if they weren't able to share the info with the forum. You will have read my suspicion - that QF was using the briefing to curry favour with the mods as being 'special' and to influence the course of the debate here in QF's favour. My own opinion FWIW is that they have only had limited success.
Many a time I have been offered privileged information (in business wrt corporate activity; in the share market; in local politics/council activity) but I've always said "don't tell me - if I can't use the info, I don't want to know it. It could only taint me afterwards."
I respect you and other mods for your knowledge and time put into the forum - but if mods are getting special treatment from QF, and its not openly declared and if there seems a pattern of favours given to mods (and/or others) by QF - then I think the status of mods as a class is diminished.
Any odour, however I put at QF's feet.
So please, lets have an open declaration as to who received the briefing. And, if they choose, an opinion, with the benefit of hind sight, as to whether it was a good idea to be on the hearing end, since the info was not able to be passed onto the forum members. Why did the recipients think they were being included?
Thanks.
Last edited: