AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Yes completely understand there are consequences. I think the issue I have is whether a freedom of choice is really a choice at all where the consequences sought to cause detriment to someone's livelihood. Same goes for the vaccine mandates for workers.ND had and still has, complete freedom of choice about whether to be vaccinated. But actions have consequences, even non-actions, and in this case the freedom that was curtailed was to pursue his sporting interest down under.
Where one person’s choice can put other people at risk, the choices of the majority must win.Yes completely understand there are consequences. I think the issue I have is whether a freedom of choice is really a choice at all where the consequences sought to cause detriment to someone's livelihood. Same goes for the vaccine mandates for workers.
Don't think this reasoning really works. Take it to the extreme, a person with covid 'chooses' to be admitted to hospital, which puts the hospital at risk (as we have seen how in the earlier days when health workers got infected in hospitals), so does that mean we shouldn't admit that person because it's causing a risk to the people there? Since those earlier days, hospitals have put in risk mitigation strategies, which can also be applied to the tennis. The governments just decide not to do that.Where one person’s choice can put other people at risk, the choices of the majority must win.
Hospitals by their very nature are always a risky place. People still choose to work there. Their choice. All workplaces carry some level of risk. To mitigate risk to the majority, TA insisted all players be vaccinated or not attend. Businesses likewise to protect their workers. Choices. This has already been thoroughly discussed.Don't think this reasoning really works. Take it to the extreme, a person with covid 'chooses' to be admitted to hospital, which puts the hospital at risk (as we have seen how in the earlier days when health workers got infected in hospitals), so does that mean we shouldn't admit that person because it's causing a risk to the people there? Since those earlier days, hospitals have put in risk mitigation strategies, which can also be applied to the tennis. The governments just decide not to do that.
These are the seats I want to see on QF and VA
Except for a few who got a special panel reconsideration.TA insisted all players be vaccinated or not attend
Spain has just praised Australias actions.
But, so what? He’s well paid…hideously so for someone who simply chases a ball around a court. He doesn’t get to be above the rules as well.Despite all this controversy and what one may think of his personality, he is one of the greatest tennis players we have ever seen.
Funny how their freedom is important, but the freedom of others isn’t.ND had and still has, complete freedom of choice about whether to be vaccinated. But actions have consequences, even non-actions, and in this case the freedom that was curtailed was to pursue his sporting interest down under.
As the vaccination rates rise and as more data become available that show vaccinations do not significantly reduce transmission and as more people get immunised by the wild virus, it is becoming clearer that the unvaccinated are not posing a risk to other people.Where one person’s choice can put other people at risk
Vamos! Rafa!Spain has just praised
I heard that he can't play in France and it was the Sport Minister who claimed he could. But new laws passed today suggest he can't.Vamos! Rafa!
Just politician speaking. Remember Macron who wanted to piss off the Unvaxxed French. He only did this when the Vax rate in France went into mid 90s.
Now france says NoVax can play?
There are services that the Government will provide to everyone even if it's their choice that lands them there.Don't think this reasoning really works. Take it to the extreme, a person with covid 'chooses' to be admitted to hospital, which puts the hospital at risk (as we have seen how in the earlier days when health workers got infected in hospitals), so does that mean we shouldn't admit that person because it's causing a risk to the people there? Since those earlier days, hospitals have put in risk mitigation strategies, which can also be applied to the tennis. The governments just decide not to do that.
Critical point being self isolation. Candidate doesn't know this meaning.Yes no issues in playing in the UK. You come over, you do your self-isolation and as noted you can test to release on day 5 if wanting to head out earlier.
That part of the world is just lines on a map, constantly moving.Another question:
Belgrade Airport is named Nikola Tesla Airport according to a post upthread
But I thought Nikola T was born in Croatia?…
Yes but ethnic SerbAnother question:
Belgrade Airport is named Nikola Tesla Airport according to a post upthread
But I thought Nikola T was born in Croatia?…