you cant possibly know that was the cause.My credit savvy score has dropped 40 points because I closed my Citibank credit card.
I am certainly not going to lose any sleep because of this, but I wonder whether the conventional wisdom in this forum that unused credit cards should be closed in order to improve credit rating is still valid.
It varies.But it’s not just equifax that they reference.
But it’s not just equifax that they reference.
Thanks. Any idea who else provides the info, so that I can get a report from them too?
Regards,
Renato
There is also Experian (nee Veda) and illion (nee Dun & Bradstreet).
Experian info from creditsavvy.com.au
Dunn & Bradstreet from creditsimple.com.au
Equifax/Veda from getcreditscore.com.au
28 Degree Mastercard just showed up on Credit Savvy.
This does now make things more difficult for churning. No way I'm going overseas with a tiny credit limit on that card.
Regards,
Renato
Interesting. I doubt anyone here will get caught with their pants down, but a few out there will probably run into some headwinds next year.
https://www.theage.com.au/money/bor...ristmas-shoppers-lending-20181129-p50j6h.html
That's the traditional interpretation from the banks but as far as the legislation goes the responsibility for responsible lending falls on the credit provider. In my view it is likely that an outcome of the Royal Commission will be a stronger stance from the regulators and the government in regards to validating the lenders repayment capacity, I'm not sure the its "too costly an adminstrative burden" argument used in the past will be regarded as acceptable. There is already some evidence of this being applied to bank practices which are in place mainly for ease of administration.It likely wont be as bad as it seems, because the lenders still want to get your credit card business, they know that means you will be cancelling an existing card. Alll they have to do is comply with the legislation. If the assessor must include existing card limits + new card limit, hardly anyone would get a new credit card. Its no different to refinancing a PL or HL, the decision is made on the 'post loan' expenses.
The smart banks will provide a way for the applicant to declare the current credit card limits, and which ones they are 'refinancing', and those wont be included in the credit assessment. After that its still unlikely that the credit card provider will demand proof the previous limit is cancelled, that would be too costly an administrative overhead. Rather the onus will be on the cardholder to make good on the cancellation. If they dont and then run into debt problems, the cardholder wont be able to claim the credit card company was irresponsible in approving the limit.
Charge cards need to be paid off each month and hence aren't regarded as a credit instrument, so you are correct.One of the only positive consequences of the Amex changes is that the best-earning cards shouldn't affect your limits on Comprehensive Reporting (or am I mistaken about the status of Charge cards)