Dan Murphy's and Other Wine Deals

This is the first time I have ever heard of a blender being used. My usual wine drinking group will lay down a bottle for days prior to drinking, before very gingerly opening and pouring it into your glass.

One day someone shook a bottle vigorously prior to drinking, much to the disgust of our resident Frenchman, who considered this sacrilege.

To settle the controversy we organised to drink 3 bottles of Cape Mentelle Zinfandel (2006ish from memory). One treated like a newborn baby, one aerated into a decanter, and the last shaken vigorously. It was single blind and we all voted on cards in order of preference. It was unanimous that the shaken bottle was the worst of the three; with pretty much no difference between the decanted and un-decanted.

Hardly scientific, but based on that tasting I don't ever shake wines, and only decant wines that are being drunk too young.

My opinion (based on 50 years drinking wine):

Shaking (aka the Mollydooker shake) is only for young wines that haven't thrown a crust. You have to pour out half a glass or so before shaking, in lieu of decanting. Shaking a wine with a crust turns it cloudy, affects the mouth feel and flavours due to the crust being distributed through the wine. We used to do this sometimes many years ago when tasting young wines in a group setting, if a particular wine was commented on as "closed". Sometimes it helped, mostly not and I've not used the technique in recent times, I usually have a decanter handy.

Decanting is to aerate the wine, and, for old wines, remove the sediment. Older wines that may have sediment should be stood upright for a couple of days before being moved gently to the decanting stage. When to decant (ie how long before drinking) is a black art, depending on the (age of and other characteristics) of the wine and personal preferences, for older wines I err on the side of brevity, some older wines can fade quickly in the decanter. If you decant a wine that has been lying down it can be difficult to decant without disturbing the sediment, depending on how tightly it clings to the glass or whether it is loose and settled.

I often don't decant young wines, sometimes use a pouring aerator, sometimes change my mind when tasting the first glass (if it's still "closed" after a few minutes in the glass) and see what aeration does to the wine. I've never used the blender method, but have used the microwave to warm a glass of very cold wine.

I almost always decant older cellared wines, usually within an hour of drinking, I prefer not to have the sediment in my drinking glass.
 
Thanks DB and Others. I know 2006 vintage is a difficult one. Langton had it for 35/b last year, however i missed the deal. Anyone, I heard a lot of good things about Irvin Grand and grabbed 6 bottles and will leave them in the fridge for many year. Apparently they sold it out yesterday.
 
This is the first time I have ever heard of a blender being used. My usual wine drinking group will lay down a bottle for days prior to drinking, before very gingerly opening and pouring it into your glass.

One day someone shook a bottle vigorously prior to drinking, much to the disgust of our resident Frenchman, who considered this sacrilege.

To settle the controversy we organised to drink 3 bottles of Cape Mentelle Zinfandel (2006ish from memory). One treated like a newborn baby, one aerated into a decanter, and the last shaken vigorously. It was single blind and we all voted on cards in order of preference. It was unanimous that the shaken bottle was the worst of the three; with pretty much no difference between the decanted and un-decanted.

Hardly scientific, but based on that tasting I don't ever shake wines, and only decant wines that are being drunk too young.

I imagine it might make a difference if you gently decant the contents of the bottle into the blender, leaving the lees on the walls of the bottle. Not that I've tried the blender approach myself. Maybe you can try blending half a bottle and leaving the remainder to air peacefully, W&D?

Anyway I'd also like to thank everyone for your thoughts on the Leconfield. As I showed little buying restraint I think I'll have a bet each way on cellaring vs immediate consumption. :D
 
I would never consider aeration via a blender!. Vibration (and exposure to light during wine storage) destroy wine. Quality wine fridges have no mechanical vibration for good reason. Transit shock is a real phenomenon. Every wine is different, some are more robust than others. Pouring through an aerator or decanting prior to consumption generally enhance the drinking. Some wines require and improve significantly with several hours decanting. Others fall away quickly. It is a dark science. And that bit just before the sediment is the best!;)
 
I would never consider aeration via a blender!. Vibration (and exposure to light during wine storage) destroy wine. Quality wine fridges have no mechanical vibration for good reason. Transit shock is a real phenomenon. Every wine is different, some are more robust than others. Pouring through an aerator or decanting prior to consumption generally enhance the drinking. Some wines require and improve significantly with several hours decanting. Others fall away quickly. It is a dark science. And that bit just before the sediment is the best!;)

I always thought the vibration was more of an issue for the cork closure than the wine itself. That's based purely on nothing other than what I had assumed though.
 
Fascinating to hear the variety of points of view on the Irvine Grand Merlot, I hadn't come across the blender technique prior to being gifted three of the 2006 vintage so it shouldn't be assumed that I do anything more than the conventional decant or aerate under normal circumstances; there is indeed a real protocol to opening aged wine. Just going back to the Mollydooker "shake", the explanation given by the winemaker, Sparky Marquis, is that the ritual of taking a glass from the bottle, inverting it whilst swirling, then returning to an upright position for the 'mousse' to settle down prior to drinking is to dissipate the remnant nitrogen in the wine (Mollydooker uses no sulphur in its production) as it has a discernable impact on the palate.
 
Hey folks,

Don't know if anyone is interested but I thought I'd have a crack at uncovering the new Dan's Secret Selections.

https://www.danmurphys.com.au/product/DM_MYSTERY88/secret-selections-mclaren-vale-shiraz-2012
= Shottesbrooke Eliza Shiraz

https://www.danmurphys.com.au/product/DM_MYSTERY87/secret-selections-terra-rossa-merlot-2013
= Parker Coonawarra Terra Rossa Merlot

https://www.danmurphys.com.au/product/DM_MYSTERY86/secret-selection-barossa-valley-shiraz-2013
= Teusner Albert Shiraz

Not 100% sold on them but I'll probably give the Parker Merlot a go as the rest of the Terra Rossa range is usually pretty good.
Also, I'd love to keep up to date with the good wines you guys are drinking, so if you're on Vivino give me a shout here! - www.vivino.com/users/liam-haye
 
EXCLUSIVE OFFER - Offer expires: 20 Jan 2025

- Earn up to 200,000 bonus Velocity Points*
- Enjoy unlimited complimentary access to Priority Pass lounges worldwide
- Earn up to 3 Citi reward Points per dollar uncapped

*Terms And Conditions Apply

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

seemsgood, ill give it ago, with a $50 voucher. cash rewards , wish card it's about $9ish a bottle..almost leconfield territory
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Currently Active Users

Back
Top