haha, yep. city slicker I know, laugh at your will
Are the hotels empty as they look? Who are the usual tourists that use these hotels? International guests? Average Koreans or mainly the elites?
They were relatively quiet. I
guess there would be a few factors which affect their target markets.
Firstly, DPRK is just an area of mountains, mountains after mountains. This is why a lot of the places (including places we went) end with "san", which actually means mountains / hills in Korean and Chinese (Korean and Chinese languages don't distinguish between small hills and big mountains, they are the same thing). The capital Pyongyang is actually 2 words, 平壤 , where 平 (pyong) = flat and 壤 (yang) = land or soil, or flat land. I mean the fact that whoever named it thought naming a place 'flat land' would tell you how important or significant it is to have a piece of land that is flat in this part of the world.
This lead us to, if the hotels or if I should call them tourist spots, we went to were all on mountains, or we went to those lakes and beach resorts, who would go to those places in September, when it is school term and in the middle of nowhere season, kinda like how many people would go to Thredbo or Great Ocean Rd in our May? However, I could see kids nagging their parents to buy them that floating flemingo at Lake Sijung in summer.
Another thing I noticed is, it is more likely for us to be sitting in the lobby of a Novotel and having a drink. Yes, we finish work, we are likely to go to a pub to have a p!ss session, but we are also likely to go to the lobby of a fancy Hilton and drink beer + coughtail + wine. This does not seem to be a thing in DPRK. We would be going to a local pub back in Pyongyang towards the end of this trip, and see the locals finishing work and have very loud p!ss sessions and your ears will go deaf, and I also went to pubs in the last trip in 2018, but hotels here really seem to be for sleeping and maybe functions. And from the restaurants I been to in 2018 and this 2019 trip, the locals seem rather go to a restaurant, eat, drink and karaoke. Hence, I guess, you would either be in your room, or out of the hotel. I know that we weren't the only guests in at least half the hotels we stayed in, but we hardly bumped into other guests.
I think there is a cultural difference. I mean, how many people in China / Japan / Singapore / Malaysia would just go into an actual hotel to hang out? It is not a custom. If you are young, you go to karaoke or a club for fun or to pick up; if you have 'settled down', then you go out for dinner with your coupled up friends. 2 dudes catching up to watch sports on big screen or to escape from their families would go to a bar. I don't think hanging around the lobby of an actual hotel is a culture in Asia, for Asians, hotels are for sleeping.
Ah, also, the Koreans don't do wine and coughtails, only beer. I think Novotel would lost 80% of their bar takings if they don't have coughtails and wine.
I have seen other foreigners (especially from China) and also locals in those hotels. I don't think an average joe blow would be able to afford any of the hotels we stayed in (look at their houses).
Another factor you have to consider, is our tour was travelling outside of Pyongyang. How many people go to the DPRK? Then of the tourists who go to DPRK, how many of them go somewhere other than Pyongyang and DMZ? You can have a quick look at major tour companies like Koyro Tours / Uri Tours / Young Pioneer, and it's like 50 tours to Pyongyang DMZ for 7 days or shorter, then there would be 2 or 3 tours going a little further, then there is this 1 tour per year which takes you all round and going to Paektu
san / Mount Paektu. Do the maths, and well, there is your answer.
Which I guess, explains, why we became the zoo animals back in Wonsan
I just realised that you have asked a very good question, as I am writing these answers to your question. I did this second trip to the DPRK, because I had more than enough the official museums and what not. I wanted to see the rest of the country, the rest of the people, hence this round the country road trip. Your question also created another question in my head:
Would it be better for tourists to go to places outside of Pyongyang?
People in Pyongyang would clearly have much better living standards, they have also seen enough foreigners that it is all boring routine situation normal. Having foreign inbound tourists going into all the cracks and crannies would really help breaking down the walls between people inside and outside of the DPRK, help build understandings, and have money flowing into the local economies (we ate at local restaurants, and we would actually stop in the middle of the road or a park and buy drinks or junk food from a kiosk randomly, our tour guides helped with buying and translating, no restriction at all).
On the other hand, it is much easier for foreign tourists to get used to things in Pyongyang than outside (it is more sensitive outside of Pyongyang). It is also much easier to keep naughty tourists under control in Pyongyang (see my trip report in 2018). Less change of things going wrong. Hence it is good for people to go to Pyongyang as a start.