Conclusion
I thought this trip was eye opening in many respects and actually humanised the DPRK for myself personally. I guess previously, one always thought why couldn't the US / South Korea simply solve the problem by sending a few missles to Kim Il Sung square during their mass celebrations to wipe out the top leadership? Now however, by simply being around North Koreans, you realise that they too are people like you and me, and will be the victims of any conflict. I felt trouble though that the leadership still thought it fit to indoctrinate their citizens with their cult of personality and propoganda, all the way from a young age.
It's clear that their system of Juche is not working and that they still need to rely on foreign aid to feed their people. The great famine of the 1990s was actually discussed openly by our North Korean guides - though they said that the North Korean people understood that it was only temporary hardship to build a better country. The guide also said that they had no choice but to build their military first (which was taxing on their people), to be master's of their own destiny, after which they could go about to fixing their economy. They think that they have the military sorted now, and are focussed on improving their economy.
I do have some sympathy for their military policy given they are a proud race and had suffered numerous invasions in the past. But a lot of that is also probably brought on by their own paranoia, and their insistence on keeping with their system whilst even their closest friend China is moving on. What was interesting though in the 1960s, North Korea industrialised quicker than the South and was one of the more prosperous Asian countries - thought for some reason, they stagnated after that. I guess they just could not keep up in the digital age (which maybe goes against the communist ideology of building big / grand things!)
What was also clearn from my trip was that the North still longed for reunification with the South. Obviously, they understand that the political situation at present doesn't permit it but the Koreans in the DPRK view themselves as part of one Korean people. It was clear that they didn't seem to like the new South Korean President Lee Myung Bak however.
In conclusion, on the ethics of visiting North Korea, I think its quite complicated. By visiting there, I was providing hard currency for the DPRK, which you may argue is propping up the regime further. On the other hand, isolation may also not be the solution, and foreign interaction with the people can only help improve perceptions and ties with the outside world. At the end of the day though, I think the regime would do all it can to remain in power, with or without hard currency. And it is ultimately them that will decide to open up the country. Many of the elite know what the outside world is like though many in the leadership are happy with the status quo. I just hope though that the new leadership does go down the path of reform and not oppress many sections of its population further.
In any case, I thought this trip was eye opening in many respects and actually humanised the DPRK for myself personally. I guess previously, one always thought why couldn't the US / South Korea simply solve the problem by sending a few missles to Kim Il Sung square during their mass celebrations to wipe out the top leadership? Now however, simply being around North Koreans, you realise that they too are people like you and me, and will be the victims of any conflict. I felt sad though that the leadership still thought it fit to indoctrinate their citizens with their cult of personality and propoganda, all the way from a young age.
It's clear that their system of Juche is not working - in the sense that they stil need to rely on foreign aid to feed their people. The great famine of the 1990s was actually discussed openly by our North Korean guides - though they said that the North Korean people understood that it was only temporary hardship to build a better country. The guide also said that they had no choice but to build their military first (which was taxing on their people), to be master's of their own destiny, after which they could go about to fixing their economy, which they are trying to do now. I do have some sympathy for their military policy given they are a proud race and had suffered numerous invasions in the past. But a lot of that is also probably brought on by their own paranoia, and their insistence on keeping with their system whilst even their closest friend China is moving on. What was interesting though in the 1960s, North Korea industrialised quicker than the South and was one of the more prosperous Asian countries - thought for some reason, they stagnated after that. I guess they just could not keep up in the digital age (which maybe goes against the communist ideology of building big / grand things!)
What was clear as well was the longing for reunification with the South. Obviously, they understand that the political situation at present doesn't permit it but the Koreans in the DPRK view themselves as part of one Korean people.
In conclusion, on the ethics of visiting North Korea, I think its quite complicated. By visiting there, I was providing hard currency for the DPRK, which you may argue is propping up the regime further. On the other hand, isolation may also not be the solution, and foreign interaction with the people can only help improve perceptions and ties with the outside world. At the end of the day though, I think the regime would do all it can to remain in power, with or without hard currency. Many of the elite know what the outside world is like though many in the leadership are happy with the status quo. I just hope though that the new leadership does go down the path of reform and not oppress many sections of its population further.
Added later: I also want to admit that I may have not visited the "real" North Korea given that our trip was pre-arranged by the official Korean International Tour Company. From what I gather, Pyongyang is reserved for the elite, with the rest of the country being very poor and lacking. So, please, do not take my TR as being representative of the real DPRK - its probably only how the top 10% live. There are sufficient credible eye witness reports from people who have seen the true situation on the ground to say that I witnessed a facade.
My Links
Photos:
https://plus.google.com/photos/107195565659981932634/albums#photos/107195565659981932634/albums
Videos:
Angelo Zegna - YouTube
Other Links
A State of Mind (documentary on the Arirang Games):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhAeli1DZRw
NY Philharmonic Performing in the DPRK:
NY Philharmonic performs Arirang in N. Korea - YouTube