FAA grounds 737 Max 9 Aircraft Indefinitely after Alaska Airlines incident

Curiously, one airline accounts for a large percentage of these events. Southwest.
Also the airline that demanded they get a 737 "replacement" with the same type rating so they didn't have to retrain all their crews.
 
Seems like UA and AS reported finding more loose bolts on their other planes too.
 
The only other bigger hole with aircraft survival that I'm aware of is Aloha Airlines 737 back in 1988 when part of the roof peeled off.
And don't forget United 811. Also, curiously, out of Honolulu. But, I was only thinking of events after the advent of the security coughpit doors.
Also the airline that demanded they get a 737 "replacement" with the same type rating so they didn't have to retrain all their crews.
And any threat they made to go to another maker was, of course, empty, as that would have involved much more training.
 
The only other bigger hole with aircraft survival that I'm aware of is Aloha Airlines 737 back in 1988 when part of the roof peeled off.

Yeah - that was the only one I could think of where nearly everyone got on the ground safely and the aircraft landed in one piece, that Aloha would have been a -200 Classic model and pre 9/11 coughpit doors.

1704859828763.png


Yep - happened in the 1988 incident as well, obviously air pressure differential too much for any internal door to handle...... haven't been able to find out if it happened on Southwest 2294 (2009) or Southwest 812 (2011). - both were B737-300 classics. Would be interesting to see.


Seems to be a bit of a Boeing theme of construction started in Witchita, and then completed in Renton in those failures, so starting to wonder if there is a bit of a pattern there as well?
 

Loose parts floating around, loose bolts and Boeing says they will make sure it will never happen again. Does anyone else feel that Boeing is just playing Whac-a-Mole? They are treating this as a quality control problem, but it's more likely a culture problem

If bolts are loose on one aircraft, what about other aircraft, and not only on that type but others as well?
 
I would think that a lot of the problem is the amount of expearanced workers Boeing lost over the pandemic, combined with the cost cutting focus of the exec.
 

Loose parts floating around, loose bolts and Boeing says they will make sure it will never happen again. Does anyone else feel that Boeing is just playing Whac-a-Mole? They are treating this as a quality control problem, but it's more likely a culture problem

If bolts are loose on one aircraft, what about other aircraft, and not only on that type but others as well?
The problem here is, that was basically the promise over the last couple of years.

And now we have evidence that things haven't improved at all. The 787s have been plagued by QA issues.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I would think that a lot of the problem is the amount of expearanced workers Boeing lost over the pandemic, combined with the cost cutting focus of the exec.
I think the issues about poor QA has been around for years now. There was the whole debacle about airlines not accepting 787s from South Carolina and only wanting the Everett ones a few years ago.

Boeing's response has always been we promise we'll do better. How many "we'll do better" does Boeing get.
 
Overheard at the gate desk today someone being offered an exit row seat, with the "are you happy to..."; passenger said err,no. I offered to take it . Helping out!
It was an A320😂

If you look at the number of incidents which involve evacuations down a slide or over a wing, and the number that involve fatal uncontrolled evacuations at altitude, I think I'd favour being in an exit row for that reasons.

In any event wasn't it a problem problem with a "hidden" emergency exit space and not a normal emergency exit?
 
Too lazy to read all 7 pages.
Has JB747 commented on the pressurisation warning captions? Orange or red?
Surely they were indicating a leak/weakness?
 
I think the issues about poor QA has been around for years now. There was the whole debacle about airlines not accepting 787s from South Carolina and only wanting the Everett ones a few years ago.

Boeing's response has always been we promise we'll do better. How many "we'll do better" does Boeing get.
The issue here is the 737 Max 9 and does not relate to the 737 Max 8 that VA and FJ operate.
The FAA AD was for the Max 9 only.
 
Last edited:
The issue here is the 737 Max 9 and does not relate to the 737 Max 8 that VA and FJ operate.
The FAA AWD was for the Max 9 only.
It invites a broader question of effective quality assurance and possibly FAA oversight. Quality assurance occurs on multiple levels not just on the individual production line.

Q: What else is loose?

IMG_2446.jpeg
 
Last edited:
If bolts are loose on one aircraft, what about other aircraft, and not only on that type but others as well?
A reporter asked this of the NTSB chair (who incidentally has no previous experience in the airline industry).

workers Boeing lost over the pandemic
The 787 QA issues from South Carolina and the 737Max MCAS preceded the Rona. I think many are saying Boeing lost its mojo before Rona
 
For takeoff and landing, aren't infants on laps required to be belted in to the seatbelt of the adult using using an extension seat belt/restraint? So not the same as just carrying a bag.
In the US you aren't allowed to use an infant seatbelt, yet in Australia they are required.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top