That's one route. On many routes Qantas is cheaper. In fact I believe Virgin makes a lot of money out of people assuming they are cheaper than Qantas without checking. Sometimes when I've checked Virgin can be almost double Qantas - this is especially true when Virgin has a smaller market share on the route, and/or competing with Qantas & Jetstar (ie, fewer flights means the cheap fares sell out quicker than Qantas).
To prove my point, I just did a random price comparison for SYD-BNE next Friday between 1800-2000. Cheapest on Virgin is $369 - Cheapest on Qantas is $263. Jetstar is $199. So yeah, this very much depends on routes, times and dates. I'm sure we can get plenty of examples either way.
I also get almost half of my SCs on non-Australian airlines (mostly AA or BA). I've flown with about 7-8 oneworld airlines in the last 5 years, it's great knowing I have the same benefits and I don't have to worry about booking with QF codes. I know Virgin has it's patchwork alliance but it's neither extensive nor reliable (looking at you Air NZ).
A few things in my personal experience that leads to Qantas flights being booked far more commonly than Virgin. Destinations I need to go to not serviced by Virgin (Horn Island, Wagga). Additionally, international destinations where Qantas has far greater coverage.
And I'd suggest that with regards to the cost per flight quoted in the SBS link above that because Qantas may have a significantly larger percentage of the international segments that the average cost per flight is dragged up slightly.
I do note that you will not earn a single SC whatsoever, no matter what fare class/cabin you book into, if you book direct with the largest alliance partner of QF. The SC earn on all of the main VA alliance partners (DL, SQ and EY etc) is the same if you book direct as if you book on the VA codeshare...
Who are you talking about? Emirates? They're not an alliance partner. I wouldn't want to fly with them anyway. You get QF SCs on all oneworld partners, inc BA, AA, CX, QR - it's a big list.
QF and EK believe they have a very large and important alliance. They certainly advertise it enough...
QANTAS AND EMIRATES TO EXTEND PARTNERSHIP
"The first five years of the Qantas-Emirates alliance has been a great success. Emirates has given Qantas customers an unbeatable network into Europe that is still growing. We want to keep leveraging this strength and offer additional travel options on Qantas, particularly through Asia."
I realise that is an alliance by Virgin's definition - but I was referring to the actual airline alliance (ie oneworld). Spin it any way you want it, but the SC earning options for QF members far exceed that of VA.
You've effectively lost Air NZ as a partner when you stopped earning status on trans pac / Europe - and now the plug has been pulled on the trans-tasman alliance, what's left? That's my biggest concern about VA, there's a level of security in being in a formal alliance.
So in fact QF members will be able to fly on Air NZ, receive lounge access and earn SCs (if booked as QF codeshare).
The QF/EK alliance has been deemed to be an alliance by QF (as per my link), VA has nothing to do with that. QF would most likely say it is one of their most important alliances as well.
At the end of the day, feel free to spend far more to get less. Three years of meticulous research (and flying) has proven that beyond doubt. I suppose QF record profits have got to come from somewhere.
It should also be noted that with WP retain at 800SC (vs 1200SC), there is no need to chase every single SC and this alone would offset a 'perceived' lack of SC earning partners with VA.
As this status match could very easily be considered deriving a personal benefit from Commonwealth employment
As this status match could very easily be considered deriving a personal benefit from Commonwealth employment, I'm surprised it's being allowed by the government. When Qantas grounded the fleet a few years back and then gave impacted travellers a free flight, my colleagues and I were expressly prohibited from taking up the offer because we were only being offered it because of our employment (i.e. our work travel was grounded). It's the same with the stupid no FF points policy. The idea is you're using those for your own gain.
As for the price/value - I've already shown you that this is highly dependant on individual travel patterns. Neither is categorically cheaper than the other. Certainly for the WoAG fares (back to the OT) they are often about the same.
What did you send? Just front scan of card, or PDF print of QFA member page?Sent mine in last night
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I'm not sure about the other departments, but Defence used to pay for lounge membership if you could demonstrate you flew for duty often enough.
Front of card only, expiry date was end of July 2018What did you send? Just front scan of card, or PDF print of QFA member page?
As stated, commonwealth employees are permitted to earn status credits but not frequent flyer points.
This offer is targeted to Qantas frequent flyers with status, who happen to be commonwealth employees. It's the Qantas status is what is being valued here, not the employee status.
The rules that I've seen simply say you "do not earn frequent flyer points", not that you could not earn them, nor that earning them was prohibited. That may well vary by department or EBA.
I strongly disagree with you on that one. Commonwealth employees are being specifically targeted.