Finding My Bed.... in One Hundred Hours...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Epilogue

Epilogue


So that was my story of how I spent at least 100 hours from one land bed to the next. I think that's it's only befitting that, after having experienced so many different products, that I give a brief review of each of them again. So here they are:

Lufthansa Business (intra-Europe regional, short haul)

The Good

A bit further from the riff-raff and you can disembark first.

The Bad

Not much better service than Y - a slightly better snack, a bit more elbow room. Unless you're after the miles in a program, probably not worth the price differential. The entire plane has no TVs.

The Verdict

Unless you're booking this as a connector at incidental or no extra charge, or if the differential to Economy is very small, then this product is probably not worth it.


Swiss First (intercontinental, long haul) (old product)

The Good

Very warm service by LX. Intimate cabin of only 8 passengers. Excellent food and drink selection; very innovative food choices, and delicious too. If you like a good coffee, you'll love the Nespresso. Nice amenity kits by Bally and sturdy sleeper suits. Decent bedding.

The Bad

Poor IFE selection, very limited - bring something else to entertain you. Breakfast was a bit limited and salty; perhaps a bad catering day, or simply that breakfast, like the rest of Europe, isn't usually treated as a big deal. The seating is not very intimate on its own; the trade off of having fewer people in the cabin is that there are no walls that have to separate people for their own space. This is fine if you're in the old school of thought (and not a weakness in my view), but many others say that after you've done suites everything else is clearly inferior.

The Verdict

A nice alternative to LH if you can't get F seats on the latter. Ditto this assessment if you can't score on SQ F, and even though SQ F has either private suites or a massive seat, plus caviar service and better champagne, the innovative menu on LX definitely makes for a strong alternative. I would be happy to fly LX F any time, and hope one day I can try their new F product (currently on A333 aircraft and on routes that are very difficult to get F seats for).


Thai Business (intra-Asia regional, medium haul)

The Good

You won't go hungry on TG. Meals are quite big. Presentation of meals is really good. Amenity kits even on medium haul flights (and not necessarily overnight flights) is nice. Salvatore Ferragamo accessories in the bathrooms, along with versatile dental kits. Seats have plenty of leg room and are reasonably comfy.

The Bad

Seats are angle-flat, not fully flat. Not a problem for me, since I can sleep on them, but many cannot or will not. Blankets and pillows a bit lacklustre. Food selection is sometimes a bit of a dull choice and not interesting. Drinks selection is pretty much there "because we need it", which actually felt a lot like the food as well - e.g. "we need a cheese selection because people like cheese; it doesn't matter what we pick, we just need cheese".

The Verdict

A perfectly acceptable product for medium haul flights around Asia. If you're not too picky at all, TG will satisfy your expectations without a doubt. Going above and beyond that is asking a bit much. Be patient with the TG FAs, as they are good at what they do but not necessarily at ease with their English.


Cathay Pacific Business (intra-Asia regional, short and medium haul)

The Good

Like TG, you'll rarely go hungry on CX flights, with very filling meals. Great service of meals from a cart. Almost like Chinese / Asian cultural values, FAs will dote on you and be especially concerned if you're not eating! They are very amenable, especially if the cabin is not full. Bathrooms are nicely designed and equipped with Dermalogica products. Seat is comfy, like your arm chair in your lounge at home.

The Bad

Seats only recline to about 150 degrees or so, which is fine if you can picture yourself outside at a pool lying on a recliner. Blankets are a bit thin and pillows small. The meals are a bit rich - have more than 1 or 2 in the same day and you'll probably start to feel a little bit sick (a tip for the status runners). No amenity kits even on overnight flights - I suspect they will only give them out for long haul flights. IFE is loop back on limited channels, so maybe a book or your iPad is a better bet.

The Verdict

For most flights in the CX regional network, CX J will suffice for many. It is probably on par if not a notch better than either QF or VA J trans-continental. The FAs are courteous. Try the Cathay Delight if you're on board next time!


Dragonair Business (intra-Asia regional, short and medium haul)

The Good

Comfortable seats with decent leg room, especially given a narrow body aircraft with a fairly large J cabin. Meals are sufficient and tasty. In seat power is available.

The Bad

Nothing too exciting with the food - it fills you up in a fairly tasty way and that's all you can hope for. Wine selection looks rather rudimentary. Decor is only a notch up better than, say, the QF and VA domestic J operations; not as elegant as its parent airline CX.

The Verdict

If you're going to get a narrow body aircraft, then you know your comfort will generally take a hit. Nevertheless, KA have done alright in this regard and provide a decent service. If you're planning a run using CX and have a KA option, it's a nice switch of gears if you don't feel like seeing those sea green seats for at least another flight. Like KA, you may need to be patient with the FAs due to English, but they are always willing to help you.


Thai First (intercontinental, long haul) (old product)

The Good

With only 8 seats in the cabin, it is the same style of intimacy as LX - fewer seats in the cabin in exchange for less walls. There's always plenty of food, so you won't go hungry. Presentation of meals on the carts is immaculate. One of the few First Class services in the world to still offer a caviar course. Rimowa amenity kits... well, what can I say... win? Salvatore Ferragamo accessories supplied in the bathrooms. IFE is decent, on demand and a good selection.

The Bad

Most things on Thai's service feel like its there because it has to (similar to my previous remarks). The seat is reasonably comfy (for First standards), and you just might sleep well in it too, considering there is no special underlay supplied when the seat turns into a bed. Menu seems rather boring for a First Class standard. Breakfast was not done very well. Drinks selection is fairly standard; sure, they have Dom Perri 2002, but I'm not a fan. The amenities inside the kit were nothing to write home about.

The Verdict

TG F is the only other F service offered by the Star Alliance to and from Australia besides SQ F. The former is extremely easy to get seats for, so this makes up for the fact that it may be one of the most boring F services in the world (but not necessarily the worst - there's UA F.......)


In the end, I got to experience many products for my huge expenditure of BD miles. By the end I was losing my perception and the delay due to the ash cloud didn't help, but I enjoyed the experience. I added a few more amenity kits to my collection, got some QF SCs and did it all in style.

It's a hard life, but someone has to do it. ;) :o :p :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


Fin
 
Re: Epilogue

What an excellent job you've done! Don't let anybody tell you that it's a soft life at the sharp end!

I would have had trouble relaxing on the ground, for fear that I'd zone out in a comfy chair, zonk off, and be woken up by lounge staff a day or so later.

Good to see you got a bit of exercise. HKG is really good for that. ;)
 
Re: Menu: TG475 BKK-SYD F (21 Jun 2011)

Thank you so much for posting this TR - I have really enjoyed reading it and am sorry it is now over :(
I know I'll be enjoying F one day and I hope it will be sooner rather than later!
 
Re: Menu: TG475 BKK-SYD F (21 Jun 2011)

Come on, no photo of the final bed to finish up the report?? :p ;) Nah, just joking.
Great TR Anat0l!
 
Re: Menu: TG475 BKK-SYD F (21 Jun 2011)

Great report and well worth the wait.... very much appreciate the time and effort you put into this one.
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Thanks everyone for your positive feedback on my TR!

To answer some questions (and feel free to ask other ones)...

With such a comprehensive range of amenity kits, which one (if any) do you use for travel now?

Personally, I have an old QF J kit (the hard sided one) that fits perfectly into my carryon front pocket, with a QF F kit as a backup.

Oddly enough, I normally keep most of what I need in my plastic zip lock bag that is used to comply with LAG rules, and sits in my hand carry. (For example, toothbrush, toothpaste, deodorant, cologne, moisturising cream, shave cream, razor, cotton buds, and sometimes body soap and shampoo). This has the odd consequence of deeming my LAG bag as my de facto amenity kit! Not very graceful.... :-|

My "official" amenity kit is a generic black zip case that came with my first set of personal luggage. It does the job quite well and usually contains the non-essentials or stuff that can't be kept in my hand carry (e.g. nail clippers, more cotton buds, safety pin, etc.).

The main reason I like amenity kits is to collect them. Got quite a collection at home now. If I have more than one amenity kit I sometimes consider using it when I travel (e.g. where a smaller kit bag is appropriate, or I want a separate kit with specific things in it), or consider offering it as a gift.

For those of use who are into the mathematics of it all if you are willing to share, your status run, what did it set you back and what was the SC earn ratio? Do you also factor in time away into these calculations?

I don't normally factor in time away. In my case, it was slotted into an existing itinerary.

I had a number of plans for that time taken by the CX run, but in the end I chose the CX run, rather last minute but that's what I did. It was opportunistic since it only clicked to me that I was going to be positioned in ICN, and ICN is actually a good place to start looking for such runs.

Status runs do impact on economics a lot (i.e. getting the most SCs for your $), but there are several other considerations:
  • Absolute Cost. Can you actually pay the total amount for the run (very different consideration to the SC economy)? This gets complicated if your run is paid via points and cash.
  • Positioning. You need to get to your start point. That's not easy (schedule, connections), and sometimes not cheap.
  • Time. How much time do you need to complete this run? Does this work for you?
  • Failure and Contingency. Status runs are typically as tight as possibly legal and then some (your constituency, for example). What if something goes wrong? How will you recover?
  • Ancillary. If you plan to travel with a checked bag, will this work? If you don't travel with a checked bag during the run, will you do so outside of it (e.g. when positioning), and what will you do? Do you need visas to travel on this run? How will you justify yourself to immigration if they ask? (This also impacts on your connecting timing). If you need to overnight, will you stay at a hotel (how much?) or will you sleep at the airport (or manage somehow)?

You'll usually find that one or two of those factors will ultimately create a "hard constraint" on your decision. Sometimes you find a great run in terms of SC economy, but it won't fit in schedule some how (this was my main problem, where time was the constraint, viz. just under 24 hours absolute). It's almost like going to the store looking for 10 kg of a product, and finding that 1 kg of a product is $2.00 but 100 kg of it is $140.00. You'll do well with the latter in terms of economics, but no way you're going to fit an extra 90 kg inside your house. Plus, you need to pay $140.00 rather than $20.00. So you settle with the first option.

It took me a long time to play with different destinations and different flight combinations, but I eventually came up with what I selected.

The itinerary was booked on Cathay Pacific online from the Korean portal. Itinerary was charged in Korean Won (KRW); at the conversion the price turned out to be AUD 767, including a 3% currency conversion charge. For 280 SCs, the economy comes to AUD 2.74 / SC. Not too bad for a plain SC run around the place and relatively accessible from Australia (if you can't hop to America for a short stint). As these are CX / KA flights you won't get extra credit for most QF bonus status credit promos, which can drastically change economics.

Out of all the lounges you've seen how did the European ones compare for service versus the Asian lounges?

If you are talking about service alone, I'd say they are about on par. Or rather, to elaborate...

For Business level lounges (or Business level elite lounges), there is usually no other service apart from being greeted at the door, and hopefully having your plates cleared away in a timely fashion. This is apparent both in Europe and Asia (though I didn't visit any Euro-J lounges this time, I have done so before). If you need service, you can approach someone and they will more than likely be helpful; again, common in Euro and Asia. In Asia, you sometimes need to slow down and be patient due to not being native speakers of English; in Europe you might need the same but less likely to occur.

For First level lounges, the sample size is smaller and my comparison will not be very good (viz. LH FCT and LX F, versus TG F and perhaps CX F). Service in any of the F lounges is also quite good, as "expected" for that standard of lounge. The LH FCT and LX F lounges are peculiar in that you must be either a M&M HON (very difficult level to obtain) or flying LH or LX F to get into the lounge. For TG F or CX F, you could be flying F of another carrier in the alliance and you can get in (and for CX F, you can also be a top tier elite in another alliance program). I'd like to say that the main difference between the Euro and Asian F lounges is the number of servers, but even this is not very true.

So in all, I'd say the service is pretty on dead heat. The quality of the service is probably about even, and even in F lounges where the differences should be much more pronounced, there isn't much difference after you consider some side factors.

For other aspects of the lounge, the comparison might highlight some other differences...
 
Awesome report anat0l.
Loved the descriptions, pictures, reasons/explanations and most importantly the attention to detail.

Fantastic read.
 
Wow anat0l, you're nuts! But in a good way!! :p

Thanks for committing your story to this site, definitely made for interesting reading!!!!!!!!
 
Bravo!

I dont usually read long TR's from beginning to end (often skimming through the entire thread in 5 mins) but yours was fantastic! Very entertaining with a good level of detail. You didn't linger on the generic BS, which I appreciate.

Thanks heaps
 
Only just got around to finishing this TR, but Wow, just wow :) :)
Amazing stuff, made me tired just reading about it ;)
That Rimowa TG F kit is super cute!
Thanks for taking the time to write it all up
 
Wow,

The drinks menu was huge....

If you wanted to start and one end and finish at the other end you would still be there...

Great TR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top