Plus, the velocity program will be relaunched with a new name and all.
Yes. This board, John Borghetti himself, everywhere.jack, do you really think that Virgin would rebrand their website, launch a new Amex partnership and take the time and effort to design, produce and send out new gold/silver membership cards & bag tags all within weeks of them changing the name?
Where do you get this stuff from ?!
Yes. This board, John Borghetti himself, everywhere.
Please dont tell me you just said that :shock:!!!!!. Of-course they are having a new name, who on earth know's velocity? Why would virgin themselves say that, John Borghetti said this as well "and of course in a few months, in a few months, we will roll out a completely new, and i mean a completely new frequent flyer program, so stay tuned for that one". Please go read some stuff on this board. I can tell you now, there will be a new name.They're not changing the name, mate, they're relaunching the product.
Yes. This board, John Borghetti himself, everywhere.
We already know about the Flybuys partnership, and it says September 1, so that must meen the relaunch must be before then. Plus, the velocity program will be relaunched with a new name and all.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Hello, now as for a connection with JB, complete rubbish. As you say "I can not recall JB saying this" Well i have news for you, i will give you the evidence, and DJ 1D this is for you as well. Go to 7:20 till 7:35 in the video link provided. I think some should watch it and thinking i am making rubbish.I don't mind reading the DJ threads as there's always something interesting to be discussed. However, as I don't fly DJ often I won't participate as I have nothing additional to add that might be of value.
However, this is one of the few DJ thread posts I will make where I have some value and perspective to add to a discussion, and it's this comment quoted below which has drawn me in.
For those who don't know my background, I have served on a corporate board as a Non-executive Director of a Higher Educational institution with AUD250 million/yr operating budget. In order to sit on any corporate board, even for a short length of time, you get a massive indoctrination into matters of corporate governance, information security and directors indemnity (and specially what things would void your indemnity insurance), plus codes of ethics and best practice set down by the Australian Institute for Company Directors (AICD). And that's all before a lesson in the Corporations Act and what it means to how you effectively execute your role within the law.
Jack - I've seen your posts for quite some time now, and I do not believe even for a second that you have any contact or connection with DJ's JB. And even if you did, there is no way in hell he would have uttered or disclosed a single breath to you of what DJ are planning in this regard.
And why would he have said nothing - because the information is market sensitive and without question confidential. That information would have a direct influence on their share price and how they are perceived by the market, and the release or discussion of these matters outside the board, senior management team, external partners or staff that may be involved with its design or implementation would be strictly prohibited.
Discussion of that information would be grounds to terminate someone for cause, and that is not withstanding the major coronary event their insurers, corporate governance, shareholder management and the board would have if it was discussed or disclosed before such a time when they were ready to announce to market.
Further, I cannot recall any comments by JB in public which would irrefutably support your claims.
As for posters on this forum, I'm pretty sure they are cognisant of the fact that, and it is obvious from the way they have expressed themselves, that what they have written and posted is nothing beyond speculation, scuttlebutt and rumour. You cannot suggest, specially without any factual evidence to support, that what has been suggested or guessed at will actually happen verbatim.
As for everywhere else, I again am not aware of any significant discussion or deliberation which would support your claims.
Or - let me bring brevity to the fore to express what I mean from all of the above: Cease and desist from trying to big note yourself, and claiming to know more than you actually do. It is obvious to me and no doubt many others that you don't have the first clue as to what is going on, and have zero access to any connections or reliable sources which might support your claims.
Further, most members around here have pretty well tuned BS detectors. Your posts always give off a reading of 11 every time I see one, because its obvious to me from the style of writing and language used that there is no factual basis for what you write.
So, either put up the evidence to support your claims - or crawl back into your corner and realise that your rubbish just won't wash here.
Okay Jack. Whatever you say, mate.
Jack only quoted what JB said in a press conference, he never claimed he has any link with JB, the Virgin group or anything of that nature. His information (as HE states) is from this board and other forums.
Calm down, and don't talk to other members in such a derogative manner! Relax, read the post, and think before you post.
I'm not even going to bother arguing with you, you will just have to wait and see <redacted>Sorry Jack, but suggestion or hint of something does not evidence make.
Normally, like the adult learners I've taught, I would tell you to go back and carefully re-read the text to identify the key points they missed that relate to the argument or view they have made. Sadly that technique would be lost on you.
Instead of responding with facts and evidence, you responded with supposition and twisted the comments of others in an effort to prove your point. Let me be even clearer - you twisting views and comments to support a statement which has no factual basis. You also ignored the key points of the thesis that called you out on the behaviors of concern which lead reasonable readers to believe you are 'full of it'.
Further, you ignored the robust analysis of why nothing of sufficient enough detail could be said until such a plan was ready and approved for market. It demonstrates a complete lack of competence on your part as to how the corporate world works, and the legal obligations of same.
<redacted>.
Plus sign's are easily changed they are just paper.
Also, the logo is just temporarily to blend with the new colours and the font change.