- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Posts
- 27,671
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Star Alliance
- Silver
The earliest buildings found at the Mayan city of Tikal in northern Guatemala date from the 4th Century BC, but most of the city dates from the Mayan Classic Period c. 200 to 900 AD. Its peak population may have been 70-90,000. It was one of the dominant Mayan city states, until its decline and abandonment toward the end of the 8th Century. Again, the reason for its abandonment is uncertain, with theories ranging from an extended drought, to over-population and collapse of local resources.
it was re-discovered in the mid 1800s and is one of the largest Mayan archaeological sites anywhere. Today, it is located in the 576 sq km Tikal National Park, established 1955, mainly consisting of the city and surrounding dense rain forest. The site was declared a UNESCO World heritage site in 1979, the first to be both for cultural and natural heritage/values. Along with adjacent areas, it comprises the Maya Bioshphere of approximately 21,000 sq km. Rainfall averages 1,350mm and temperature mainly varies between 21 to 24 degrees.
Unfortunately all of the history I'll recount here will be from a couple of books I bought, supplemented by Wikipedia. Our Guatemalan guide for the day was a huge disappointment. The Mayan civilisation of course were masters of astronomy and their calendars are pretty well know as being cosmological. Our guide unfortunately took this entirely to heart and we got 3 hours of what I would describe as 'New Age' mumbo-jumbo, with electric/energy fields being pointed out, how the human voltage of ?2.2V changes as you go up the temples, how we should all live sustainably, reduce oil consumption (yes, he actually said this) etc. Virtually nothing about the rulers of Tikal, how the buildings related to each other, excavation history etc etc. We examined no stelae. Unfortunately one of the party was right into it all, and claimed his fingers were tingling as he crossed over the various 'energy fields'. Sorry, but as a scientist and historian I had no time for this type of 'tour'.
Oh, well.
First, a map, from this site.
So here is Temple I again, on the left, 47m high and built in the mid 700s. Unlike Caracol, you can't climb the structures but several have wooden staircases on the sides, allowing you to reach the viewing platforms. On the right, across the Gran Plaza is Temple II, and this does have a staircase allowing you to reach the platform at the level of the bright white limestone, and the lower panorama shows the 'north Acropolis' to the left and Temple 1 in the centre and 'Maler's Palace to the right, under vegetation.
More detail of the North Acropolis, which was a funerary complex from around 350AD. Each ruler added to the complex, including building over the front, thus covering carvings etc of the predecessor. The carving on the right was found behind the current front wall of the complex. there are many stelae describing the complex and who did what, and a carved altar (the low dish in the foreground) but of course that was of no interest to us! :evil:
Looking the other way from Temple II, we see the jungle within the site and Temple IV peeking above it.
Did I mention like epiphytes ? I hope the colours come out properly.
it was re-discovered in the mid 1800s and is one of the largest Mayan archaeological sites anywhere. Today, it is located in the 576 sq km Tikal National Park, established 1955, mainly consisting of the city and surrounding dense rain forest. The site was declared a UNESCO World heritage site in 1979, the first to be both for cultural and natural heritage/values. Along with adjacent areas, it comprises the Maya Bioshphere of approximately 21,000 sq km. Rainfall averages 1,350mm and temperature mainly varies between 21 to 24 degrees.
Unfortunately all of the history I'll recount here will be from a couple of books I bought, supplemented by Wikipedia. Our Guatemalan guide for the day was a huge disappointment. The Mayan civilisation of course were masters of astronomy and their calendars are pretty well know as being cosmological. Our guide unfortunately took this entirely to heart and we got 3 hours of what I would describe as 'New Age' mumbo-jumbo, with electric/energy fields being pointed out, how the human voltage of ?2.2V changes as you go up the temples, how we should all live sustainably, reduce oil consumption (yes, he actually said this) etc. Virtually nothing about the rulers of Tikal, how the buildings related to each other, excavation history etc etc. We examined no stelae. Unfortunately one of the party was right into it all, and claimed his fingers were tingling as he crossed over the various 'energy fields'. Sorry, but as a scientist and historian I had no time for this type of 'tour'.
Oh, well.
First, a map, from this site.
So here is Temple I again, on the left, 47m high and built in the mid 700s. Unlike Caracol, you can't climb the structures but several have wooden staircases on the sides, allowing you to reach the viewing platforms. On the right, across the Gran Plaza is Temple II, and this does have a staircase allowing you to reach the platform at the level of the bright white limestone, and the lower panorama shows the 'north Acropolis' to the left and Temple 1 in the centre and 'Maler's Palace to the right, under vegetation.
More detail of the North Acropolis, which was a funerary complex from around 350AD. Each ruler added to the complex, including building over the front, thus covering carvings etc of the predecessor. The carving on the right was found behind the current front wall of the complex. there are many stelae describing the complex and who did what, and a carved altar (the low dish in the foreground) but of course that was of no interest to us! :evil:
Looking the other way from Temple II, we see the jungle within the site and Temple IV peeking above it.
Did I mention like epiphytes ? I hope the colours come out properly.