Out of the whole article, I would agree with questioning why AVV is in need of support, MEL-SYD has plenty of cheap airfares at the moment, and is it really that big of an incentive to travel Surf Coast/Great Ocean Road from AVV rather than MEL? It seems very much a JQ subsidy (and as an aside, purely anecdotal, bookings for our holiday house - located on Surf Coast - have been 20% higher (in dollar value) for first half of 2021 compared to first half of 2019 and not sure we are an exception, but if that is repeated across the coast, I really wonder what the fuss is about in that particular area.)
Yes AVV is a weird one, thats just a JQ subsidy really.
Cynical people would say:
Coolongatta, Hamilton Is, Prosepine, Maroochy, Cairns, Merimbula, Burnie, Devonport, Launceston and western suburbs of Melbourne all marginal electorates. Alice Springs and Uluru probably not so much, but would be genuinely suffering lack of international visitors, Merimbula is a marginal electorate and Kangaroo Island an extra bailout for damage to their local economies from previous summer bushfires, WA punished for its isolationist stance, but with a mining boom underway not a large priority (just heard on the radio from the WA tourism board who were not happy).
But realistically, a lot of these destinations are popular locations for interstate and international tourists and would have higher dependence on the tourism industry than a lot of other places in Australia. There are a few notable omissions though, surely Darwin might have made a good case?
Not sure of the length of the subsidy but North QLD and Broome seem attractive destinations in winter, Northern Tasmania and Merimbula maybe not so much but if it stretches into summer the obviously that attractiveness flips over the other way.
From a policy standpoint, maybe all the announced subsidies should have been interstate routes to discourage state border shenanigans? The OOL subsidies to current operators but not offered to Rex will leave them open to possible ACCC action.