Simply as a matter of record because there are numerous Internet media reports, the gent alleged to be the perpetrator appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday 28 November and was again remanded in custody until what the magistrate Jelena Popovic indicated was a likely release on bail on 14 December 2016, but the latter awaits a psychological report.
The alleged hoaxer claims through his solicitor to have been finding life difficult on remand as he has been sharing a cell with various males in their 40s and 50s, at least one of whom was a drug addict. The latter is not particularly unusual in prisons (sadly).
Without wishing to stray too far from the subject matter, since it's an area I know little about, is it appropriate for autism sufferers to be incarcerated (or on remand in custody)? I am not especially referring to the current case - just a quick general question. Or is 'autism' claimed as a 'catch all' defence by barristers and solicitors to try to get their clients out of prison, or ultimately exonerated?