SeatBackForward
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Posts
- 5,226
- Qantas
- LT Gold
- Oneworld
- Emerald
Wonder if Sydney Airport Corporation Limited's shareholders are concerned. Probably not.
I’m not sure. Didn’t Dan Andrews shut down VIC again, again, again etc?construction works
That’s why and for other related reasons I’m not rushing to buy a ticket to anywhere soon.Insufficient staff at checkin counters,
Airfares cheaper than petrol?Lots of passengers but no one can afford fuel for their cars?.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Chanelling Sir Humphrey there, @jrfspAirlines would be far better off if they refused to fly passengers
Yep, they seem in dire need of some operations management or basic logistics planning training. It's actually not that hard to forecast demand that close to departure time, as you say @eastwest101.Not just in SYD either, judging by others comments and media articles from Manchester and other airports round the world. Seems pretty amateurish though considering the airlines would be able to predict an hour by hour breakdown of planned aircraft departures and total passenger numbers in their booking system so it should really just be a process of giving these numbers to the security contractors for the next few days and adjusting the size of the workforce to meet demand. Its not like people wait until the day before they fly to book their flights.
OMG, you would hope that whoever is the client for the security contract had the procurement brains to go with a performance contract ie "supplier will be able to process passengers with a maximum wait time of 15/20/30 minutes" rather than an inputs based contract ie "have x security people rostered". Clients are not buying inputs they are buying the service of security clearance of pax. The suppliers would then legitimately expect to have estimated pax numbers and would be able to dynamic roster accordingly. Looks like it's not only the call centre staff that lack skills and training!Yeah - its up to the airport to provide the facilities that can stay open without the roof leaking onto electronic equipment, so airport owners fault there, but the staffing levels themselves would be under the control of the security company contractors managment? They would be making the day to day decisions of rostering on X number of people for Y hours at each terminal. Surely there would be some sort of information gathering from all the airlines to the security contractors as to approximate numbers of departing pax each day?
Depends where you're flying from/to.That’s why and for other related reasons I’m not rushing to buy a ticket to anywhere soon.
AJ now trying to backtrack....whoopsy must have got a message from the board.Alan's blaming passengers.....
"Mr Joyce agreed, stating at a press conference that “our customers are not match fit”.
“I went through the airports on Wednesday and people forget they need to take out their laptops, they have to take out their aerosols ... so that is taking longer to get through the queue.”"
Airlines would be far better off if they refused to fly passengers
I’ve just re-read my earlier post and I’m sorry if this sounded directed at you @eastwest101 - certainly wasn’t! I’m in strong agreement with your comments. My suggestion about lack of training was for Qantas procurement and contracting staff. I must try to be clearer in my rants!OMG, you would hope that whoever is the client for the security contract had the procurement brains to go with a performance contract ie "supplier will be able to process passengers with a maximum wait time of 15/20/30 minutes" rather than an inputs based contract ie "have x security people rostered". Clients are not buying inputs they are buying the service of security clearance of pax. The suppliers would then legitimately expect to have estimated pax numbers and would be able to dynamic roster accordingly. Looks like it's not only the call centre staff that lack skills and training!
No need for apologies, you were making a good point the airlines collect the passenger movement and security charges, that money the goes to the relevant airport owner who then subcontract out the actual job of staffing screening and security on a per passenger amount. These contracts should have some sort of measurable performance metrics, if drafted properly as you say.I’ve just re-read my earlier post and I’m sorry if this sounded directed at you @eastwest101 - certainly wasn’t! I’m in strong agreement with your comments. My suggestion about lack of training was for Qantas procurement and contracting staff. I must try to be clearer in my rants!
There have been hassles at Canberra screening for a while, due to staff shortages. Many a time there is only one female staff member on the screening, who is the only person who can do pat downs/checks on female passengers. Every time someone needs to be checked, female passengers are stopped from going through security until the checks are over. MrsK refused to let me go through without her, muttering something about how I'm not allowed to be left unsupervised in the lounge.Full body scans required today in Canberra and random selection in Adelaide yesterday plus body Pat downs (either in the open or option for in private) now required aren't helping with crowding here either.
I got the impression from Mr P they were patting down everyone not just randoms. In Adelaide, and only Adelaide, it's umbrellas. Melb security laugh each time I ask them if I need to take one out.There have been hassles at Canberra screening for a while, due to staff shortages. Many a time there is only one female staff member on the screening, who is the only person who can do pat downs/checks on female passengers. Every time someone needs to be checked, female passengers are stopped from going through security until the checks are over. MrsK refused to let me go through without her, muttering something about how I'm not allowed to be left unsupervised in the lounge.