Official Qantas Presser:
4x weekly to start off.
4x weekly to start off.
I learnt my LAX lessons over 15 years ago. Main one was never to connect from East cost USA there at less than four hours. This meant abandoning the QF same day Qantas JFK flights.I never get to experience the lounge at LAX because im always connecting from JFK and there isnt time. Otherwize i fly home direct from DFW or SFO or HNL, because i find no pleasure spending time in LA, if im spending time in CA it will alwwys be in San Fran.
Flight number is QF21/224x weekly to start off.
It's about 10NM shorter than LHR-PER so should be fine.
Think it'll be a while before JFK resumes (if at all).
If QF does eventually resume JFK, the question is whether it'll be a tag from DFW or from LAX (ex-BNE).
So the higher temperatures at DFW won't be an issue for the west-bound B787s that they occasionally posed for the B744s? Regards, BD
Don't think so - obviously it's not a binary question, it's a how much (payload) question. If I recall it was the headwinds that caused most of the problems with the 747s.
PER can get pretty warm too...
PER can get pretty warm too...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
PER has usually cooled down to under 30C by the time the flight to LHR departs.
A 787 is not a 744. That's just about the end of the story. You can't apply restrictions from one aircraft to another.So the higher temperatures at DFW won't be an issue for the west-bound B787s that they occasionally posed for the B744s?
A 787 is not a 744. That's just about the end of the story. You can't apply restrictions from one aircraft to another.
I hope that’s tongue in cheek.Really? So a 787 isn't bigger than a 744 .... ???
I hope that’s tongue in cheek.