QF suggested origin/destination demand very strong on the route - not sure which cabin though.Only from PER
For the majority of passengers it is still a one stop.
SIN is actually preferred for passengers like me.
QF suggested origin/destination demand very strong on the route - not sure which cabin though.Only from PER
For the majority of passengers it is still a one stop.
SIN is actually preferred for passengers like me.
Looking at recent trips on FR24, the standard route appears to fly in between Iran and Israel, right over Iraq.Just humouring the use of the great circle map (noting flights often do not follow it exactly), the OP noted the issue is that Iran may attack Israel. The route map attached appears to go very close to Israel which would be the other party in such an incident.
Edit: modified “over” to “close to”
Sure but the 787-9 carries less than half of the passengers on a full A380QF suggested origin/destination demand very strong on the route - not sure which cabin though.
QF suggested origin/destination demand very strong on the route - not sure which cabin though.
I've always said that safety is a low consideration for most passengers and for that matter airline travel influencers who spruik airline products.What’s interesting is pax flying on QF tickets but EK metal to Europe, which are flying the route that QF has deemed too risky….
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Now Israel, Jordan and Iran has closed airspace!
the biggest gulf carrier is EK with the most Europe flights...Egypt too apparently
looks like the gulf carriers will basically cancel westbound flights
Egypt too apparently
I've seen rogue reports of that but none from creditable sources.
Flightradar shows a massive amount of civil aircraft in its airspace right now.
QF10 recently flew over Egypt, Saudi, UAE and Oman to get home.
I hope this is the end but i doubt it - Israel and US will take revenge... i fear this is just the beginning @justinbrettIran's UN delegation allege on X that their mission has concluded.
Will be interesting to see if things settle down quickly or there is some silly retaliation to a failed exercise.
Sure but the 787-9 carries less than half of the passengers on a full A380
If demand is very strong, why is there only one PER-LHR?. . It used to be a double A380 (and before that more 747 between Australia and London???)
Now it's the equivalent of 1.5 A380
Put a second 787-9 on the route and see what happens to seat yields. Is this just limiting seats and targeting higher yielding passengers?.
Me thinks there is a bit of hyperbole involved.
I don't understand why those on the east coast are so sore about the success to PER-LHR. It's clearly a very profitable route with all cabins generally full. Why so much hate?
Anything to dump on Perth, really. We are not wanted by the rest of the country, and nothing we do will ever be worthwhile, or if it is worthwhile, acknowledged. Qantas flying successful international routes out of Perth runs counter to that narrative.I don't understand why those on the east coast are so sore about the success to PER-LHR. It's clearly a very profitable route with all cabins generally full. Why so much hate?