Again your not making sense, why use an aircraft that's not suited to a route if you have the luxury of being able to put people on the right type at home base for onward flights, SQ and JAL are two who do operate 77W back to home base, it's a phallacy to suggest the 777s don't suit Asian operations because it's a sweeping generalization not based on facts or recognizing that you can have some pretty long flights ex Asia to Oz. You could also say that if airlines do want to utilize the 77Ws back to home then fly onward that suits DJ anyway, a quick dash up to PEK and back then onward to the US rather than having it sit on the ground during an off day makes sense as well, just like AUH to KUL rather than sitting on the ground at AUH!
There is a difference between using a 777 because you've got them or because of fleet commonality issues and buying *new* 777s to operate a route that doesn't use their capabilities. If you are opening new asian routes wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to by the most efficient planes for the route - particularly when you've already got them in your fleet?
You said above that the A330s aren't configed for international ops but that's a relatively minor costs compared to buying new 777s. Particularly given that the new a330s are getting RED and an as yet unspecified new J class layout.
The Chinese airlines all use A330's to Australia for a reason
Is there still any truth to the rumour of dropping the MEL-LAX route in favour of daily BNE-LAX flights?
If not, perhaps a couple of extra 777 could fill up both routes?
It's doubtful they would purchase any as spare though (as much as that would be great for peace of mind).
They tend to keep them in the air as constantly as possible as it costs too much to have any on the ground. (As can be seen by the deal with EY)
As DJ have stated that Perth is a major target for expansion for them could they be looking at PER-AUH to connect onto EY European services. That would probably bring the most benefit for the 777's.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Although PER-AUH is in A330 range based on my rough calculations.
Certainly, the LAX-SYD incident last year certainly shows the need for additional aircraft to cover the unexpected.
Tug drivers backing the 777's into stationary objects (walls) I believe.What else was there besides the engine stall on take off in April 2011?
I am more interested in what the refit of the current VA 777's entails.....
On a recent VA flight in J from BNE to LAX to senior flight attended confirmed the J cabin upgrade commencing this month isn't anything major. The same seats are staying but will receive new coverings and extra cushioning to make them more comfortable. That's it. The airline (VA) isn't ready to invent heavily in new seats given the product is still relatively young.
10/10 for that