New aviation industry ombudsman & customer rights charter in Australia

Interesting the party of free enterprise wanting to intervene on market forces at work.

Well the party doesn’t.

It’s just that one particular shadow minister who has some strong opinions on QF. Still holds chairman’s lounge membership though.
 
Minister Catherine King called the divestment “a dangerous thought bubble”. What a hoot. Doubling down on the QF protection racket.
The only bubble when it comes to protecting Australian consumers is the one between the minister’s ears.
 
FT reporting that even the US is now considering a EU/UK 261 type compensation scheme.

 
FT reporting that even the US is now considering a EU/UK 261 type compensation scheme.

As per usual, the rest of the world is ahead of Australia !
 
How is this not a conflict of interest?
CLEO here - it is a conflict of interest.
Post automatically merged:

t’s a conflict of interest if it’s not declared
It’s a conflict whether declared or not.

The test is whether the private interest is sufficient to distort or influence the exercise of public duty.
 
EXCLUSIVE OFFER - Offer expires: 20 Jan 2025

- Earn up to 200,000 bonus Velocity Points*
- Enjoy unlimited complimentary access to Priority Pass lounges worldwide
- Earn up to 3 Citi reward Points per dollar uncapped

*Terms And Conditions Apply

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

CLEO here - it is a conflict of interest.
Post automatically merged:


It’s a conflict whether declared or not.

The test is whether the private interest is sufficient to distort or influence the exercise of public duty.
Indeed. And then it comes down to how you manage the conflict of interest.
 
Indeed. And then it comes down to how you manage the conflict of interest.

And we have no idea how the minister, nor the secretaries in her department, have managed this conflict of interest, because they haven't given a single explanation or reason as to why a compensation scheme is not mentioned in the White Paper.
 
And we have no idea how the minister, nor the secretaries in her department, have managed this conflict of interest, because they haven't given a single explanation or reason as to why a compensation scheme is not mentioned in the White Paper.
Well she has now
 
Well she has now

From what I can tell from this interview, she doesn't want a compensation scheme because it could increase the price of airline tickets?

That line is straight out of the airline playbook and it hasn't really been proven to be true elsewhere. (In any case, if it did increase ticket prices, it would probably still be worth it because any costs that the scheme adds to airlines would go back to passengers who've been messed around by them and could have incurred real financial losses as a result.)

This still doesn't really give any insight into how she's managing the obvious conflict of interest of having Chairmans Lounge membership while also being the minister in charge of aviation.
 
I don't understand the obsession with compensation and ignoring the more important and valuable aspect of EU/UK regulations in event of delay or cancellation:
- reimbursement of all additional expenses, including transport, accommodation and meals
- choice to be re-booked on another airline to get you to your destination sooner
- choice for a full refund AND a return flight to your origin if mid-booking,

This applies to all delays and cancellations, whereas compensation only applies in the absence of extraordinary circumstances.
 
I don't understand the obsession with compensation and ignoring the more important and valuable aspect of EU/UK regulations in event of delay or cancellation:
- reimbursement of all additional expenses, including transport, accommodation and meals
- choice to be re-booked on another airline to get you to your destination sooner
- choice for a full refund AND a return flight to your origin if mid-booking,

This applies to all delays and cancellations, whereas compensation only applies in the absence of extraordinary circumstances.

All of the things you've described would be most welcome!
 
Here is the link to the proposed charter for customer flights. No EU261 scheme, so not sure what value it adds other than a feel good statement. It will take years and lots of cases to define what is meant by these statements.


Here is direct link to the proposed charter
 
Last edited:
My pet hate is Qf and JQ allow only $200 per night for hotel accommodation..try getting a hotel room for that at the last minute at an airport location!
 
My pet hate is Qf and JQ allow only $200 per night for hotel accommodation..try getting a hotel room for that at the last minute at an airport location!


I know this has been well documented, but I have recently had luck with a successful claim overnight as near to SYD airport as I could for around $360 so it seems that Qantas at least has got some discretion about the costs for accommodation for pax affected by delays and flight cancellations. They surely must know that bad weather in SYD and a bunch of flight cancellations will routinely/inevitably send hotel prices over $200 per night anywhere near Mascot airport.

I wouldn't fancy the same chances of success with Jetstar though.

That will be one for the submissions though that the cost of reimbursement needs to reflect the conditions at the time adequately. And it should be automatic because airlines now have sufficient software to see flight delays' effects on transit passengers.
 
Here is the link to the proposed charter for customer flights. No EU261 scheme, so not sure what value it adds other than a feel good statement. It will take years and lots of cases to define what is meant by these statements.


Here is direct link to the proposed charter
Agree. Basically nothing has changed! Or needs to be changed by aussie airlines.

The only thing I can see, really, is that if your flight is delayed or cancelled, and you book on another carrier, your original fare must be refunded. Note… your new fare isn’t covered, just the airline must refund the previous one you didn’t take.

But essentially that’s no different to ACL.

Like that the passenger must have access to customer service. But it doesn’t say how long the queue time has to be! You could be waiting for 2 hours and not be in breach of the charter.

The ridiculous part? They want simple and fair contracts of carriage. I’m not sure that’s even possible! Plain English, yes, but you cant really simplify of lessen the amount of stuff that’s in there. For example there’s whole sections on the rights conferred by EC261 and the US and Canadian DOTs (or equivalent).

Anyway… much ado about nothing!

But again, given the frequency of flights in Australia between the major cities… it’s unlikely delay compensation a la 261 would even kick in. Internationally it might have done.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top